User:Nick Gardner /Sandbox: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
imported>Nick Gardner No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Action (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press). | Action (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press). | ||
Darwin (1874:178- | |||
179)Darwin, C. | |||
1874 The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2nd ed. 2 vols. New | |||
York: American Home Library. | |||
thought, competed tribe against tribe as well as individually, and that the “social and | |||
moral faculties” evolved under the influence of group competition: | |||
It must not be forgotten that although a high standard of morality gives but slight | |||
or no advantage to each individual man and his children over other men of the | |||
tribe, yet that an increase in the number of well-endowed men and an | |||
advancement in the standard of morality will certainly give an immense | |||
advantage to one tribe over another. A tribe including many members who, from | |||
possessing in a high degree the spirit of patriotism, fidelity, obedience, courage, | |||
and sympathy, were always ready to aid one another, and to sacrifice themselves | |||
for the common good, would be victorious over most other tribes; and this would | |||
be natural selection. | |||
<references/> | <references/> |
Revision as of 03:35, 28 December 2009
Social capital then emerges in the form of expectations that others will reciprocate in response to co-operative initiatives; and it can spread through the community as more and more people become aware of the advantages of cooperation.
whether or not co-operation takes root will depend on the pre-existing set of social and political relations in the community and on the degree of inequality and polarization suffered by society
. Robert Axelrod, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 1984).
Social Capital: Explaining Its Origins and Effects on
Government Performance
CARLES BOIX AND DANIEL N. POSNER British Journal of Political Science (1998)
Ostrom, Elinor, 1990, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective
Action (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press).
Darwin (1874:178- 179)Darwin, C. 1874 The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2nd ed. 2 vols. New York: American Home Library.
thought, competed tribe against tribe as well as individually, and that the “social and moral faculties” evolved under the influence of group competition: It must not be forgotten that although a high standard of morality gives but slight or no advantage to each individual man and his children over other men of the tribe, yet that an increase in the number of well-endowed men and an advancement in the standard of morality will certainly give an immense advantage to one tribe over another. A tribe including many members who, from possessing in a high degree the spirit of patriotism, fidelity, obedience, courage, and sympathy, were always ready to aid one another, and to sacrifice themselves for the common good, would be victorious over most other tribes; and this would be natural selection.