CZ:Charter/Things to address but not in charter: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Russell D. Jones
(policies)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
(Improved statistics)
Line 6: Line 6:
#How to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types?
#How to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types?
#Policies: Neutrality policy, approval policy, style policy, user page use policies, etc.
#Policies: Neutrality policy, approval policy, style policy, user page use policies, etc.
#Statistics: how are we doing?  That has to include read counts, not only creation statistics. Definition of success might be  in the charter.

Revision as of 20:07, 16 October 2009

This page and its parent page are dedicated to drafting a charter for Citizendium and should only be edited by those eight Citizens elected to the drafting Committee. Other Citizens, please comment on the dedicated thread at the Citizen Forum. Non-Citizens can comment in a separate thread at the non-Member Forum. The drafting period shall end when November 12, 2009 is over all around the globe.

This page lists some of the things that should be institutionalized but not directly in the charter. Points to be addressed in the charter are collected at CZ:Charter drafting/Things to address but not in charter.

  1. How to decide about editorship?
  2. How to decide about technical features, e.g. new subpage types?
  3. Policies: Neutrality policy, approval policy, style policy, user page use policies, etc.
  4. Statistics: how are we doing? That has to include read counts, not only creation statistics. Definition of success might be in the charter.
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=CZ:Charter/Things_to_address_but_not_in_charter&oldid=698420"