Exercise and body weight

This page was started in the framework of an Eduzendium course and needs to be assessed for quality. If this is done, this {{EZnotice}} can be removed.

A brief overview of your interest group (be sure to put its name in bold in the first sentence) and the scope of the article goes here.

The following list of sections should serve as a loose guideline for developing the body of your article. The works cited in references 2-5 are all fake; their purpose is to serve as a formatting model for your own citations.

Title of Part 1

Title of Subpart 1

In here you could write about various informations linked to various references for example from journals.

Maintenance of Long-Term Weight Loss

It has been shown in many studies that following weight loss, subjects often regain the lost weight, and sometimes even overshoot their original weight. Abderson et al , having analysed a large number and variety of weight loss studies carried out in the US that more than 35% of lost weight is regained within the first year, and the majority within five.(1) Metabolism plays a key role in this. Among other inputs, the reduction of leptin and insulin tell the brain that the body is energy-deficient, resulting in a drive to eat along with suppressed energy expenditure. The body’s choice of fuel also changes within the diurnal cycle and is affected by lifestyle. Therefore, to maintain their new weight, individuals need to limit their food intake to the same extent that expenditure is suppressed.

The role of exercise in this:

There is evidence to suggest that regular exercise prevents or counters these metabolic adaptations that lead to weight regain. Work done by MacLean et al (2) showed that not only that relapsing rats that exercised presented a reduction in weight in liver tissue and mesenteric fat pads compared to their sedentary counterparts, but did not succumb to the overeating normally seen after dramatic weight loss. The energy balance previously mentioned was delayed and much reduced (roughly 40%), therefore greatly reducing the rats’ desire to gorge themselves. Lean rats show a diurnal shift in fuel usage (favouring carbohydrates during the dark cycle and fat during the light). Obese rats did not present this shift. It however returned after weight loss. (see if can find more on this) In sedentary rats, carbohydrates were favoured regardless, while fat was stored and significant lipogenesis was observed.

AMPK is a hypothalamic nutrient sensor that responds to low nutrient availability. Signals from the periphery (leptin, insulin) were not increased by exercise regimes. The reception of these signals, however, seems to be more involved. Acute bouts of exercise have been shown in the study by MacLean et al to lessen the response of AMPK to peripheral deprivation signals, thereby reducing the drive to overfeed. Rats that had lost weight were observed to alternate massive overeating with periods of deprivation. Daily aerobic exercise reduced the extremes in fuel consumption that are associated with this phenomenon as well as the excessive desire to eat and/or hunger pains that are the downfall of many individuals after a calorie-restricted weight loss program.

The work done by MacLean et al suggested that preventing the typical increase in adipocytes may affect the ability to store excess calories, as the peripheries are wired so as to process and store any fuel excess rapidly and efficiently to promote regain and return to the defended body weight. The drive to physical activity is tightly regulated and has been shown to directly influence adiposity and body weight.

Title of Part 2

You can also cite published work accessible online.

Contradictory evidence for the link between exercise and a reduction in body weight

More than half of British adults are overweight, and obesity among school children has increased by 70% in the past generation (Jeffery et al., 2004).

It is undisputed that if energy expenditure exceeds energy consumption, weight loss will be achieved. This is only maintained if energy expenditure and consumption are matched at this reduced body weight, in the long-term.

The correlation between increasingly sedentary lifestyles and the obesity epidemic has lead to a broad assumption that physical inactivity is to blame for the worldwide crisis. However, there is compelling evidence emerging to the contrary.

Perhaps the most reliable reports have been produced by the EarlyBird study, currently underway at the Universities of Exeter and Plymouth. This 12 year cohort study, to be completed in 2013, involves measuring the physical activity and body composition of 300 children from the age of 5. Unlike other trials, physical activity was measured using an impressively precise CSA accelerometer-based activity monitor. Similar previous trials have depended on unreliable qualitative reports from parents or children (Metacalf et al., 2001). One of their 56 peer reviewed articles finds no association between physical activity and BMI or body fat in either sex (Metcalf et al., 2008).

Gathering evidence suggests that children are intrinsically programmed to undertake a set level of activity per day, which is determined either genetically, or as a result of an early childhood experience. Hence, it would be incorrect to implicate TV watching in any resulting daily energy surplus (Sonneville et al., 2008). Adding further credence to this, results being published by EarlyBird in the near future suggest that it is obesity that makes children decreasingly active, and not inactivity that makes children obese.

A cluster randomised controlled trial was carried out in Glasgow, in which 545 pre-school children were subjected to a realistic level of enhanced activity per week, over the course of 24 weeks. It was similarly deduced from this study that physical activity does not reduce BMI in young children (Reilly et al., 2006).

The same conclusion was reached in a review published by Harris et al., in which 18 studies meeting inclusion criteria were scrutinised, exploring the effect of school-based physical activity interventions on BMI in children. (Harris et al., 2009).

Such findings have not been exclusive to children. Church randomized 411 sedentary women to either 1 of 3 exercise groups of varying energy expenditure, or a non-exercise control group. He found that the group assigned to no exercise lost a similar amount of weight to the exercisers (Church et al., 2009).

The explanation for this controversial evidence may depend on the observation that exercise increases appetite through orexigenic peptides such as NPY (Lewis et al., 1993). Caloric overcompensation is the result of our limited capacity to deal with excess calories, due to our minimal brown fat stores, the activation of orexigenic and reward pathways in the brain, and the tendency to underestimate calorie consumption. The frequent result is excessive dietary intake, resulting in an energy imbalance and net weight gain. This theory is supported by an 18-month study by Sonneville and Gortmaker involving 538 students who, on average, consumed 100 calories more than they had just expended following exercise (Sonneville et al., 2008).

Despite the link between exercise and weight loss becoming ever more tenuous, one must not underestimate the potential benefits of exercise in not only preventing numerous diseases, but also in enhancing mental health and cognitive ability.

These findings suggest that, in the absence of the will-power to override the desire to consume surplus calories post exercise, the key to achieving a net daily energy deficit is not to increase exercise, but to focus on limiting daily calorie consumption. 'Emily Moore 13:21, 25 October 2009 (UTC)'