The Manchurian Candidate

The cover of the 1959 first edition published by McGraw-Hill

The Manchurian Candidate , first published by McGraw-Hill in 1959, is the second and most famous novel by the American political novelist and satirist Richard Condon. The story of a American soldier brainwashed by Chinese Communists during the Korean War to be an unwitting political assassin, it was the basis for two films of the same name, in 1962 (by John Frankenheimer) and 2004 (by Jonathan Demme). The term "Manchurian candidate" has been in general use for some time now to describe a person who, impelled by some sort of exterior mind control, is programmed to carry out another person's agenda. Along with some of Condon's other early works, such as The Oldest Confession and Some Angry Angel, it was the inspiration for a relatively short-lived Condon cult.

Plot

The cover of a 1962 Signet Books paperback edition.

Fifty years after its initial appearance, the story line is well-known and now close to being a cliché. Various Communists, beginning in 1936 with Lavrenti Beria in Russia and expanding to use Chinese psychologists, hatch a long-term plan to place a dedicated agent of their own at the very pinnacle of American power, the United States presidency. To this end, 15 years later they seize and brainwash an American soldier, Raymond Shaw, during the Korean War. Shaw is released and becomes an national hero. Shaw is then manipulated and used in various ways by his scheming mother to further the political ambitions of her second husband, a Joe McCarthy-like senator who is now Raymond's stepfather. Raymond hates his stepfather; his mother's ultimate goal, however, is have this alcoholic, semi-cretinous Senator Johnny Iselin nominated as the presidential candidate of one of the major American political parties. Half the book is devoted to the rise of Iselin; the other half is about the attempts of another brainwashed American soldier, Major Ben Marco, to find out what has happened to his old comrade-in-arms and what apparently nefarious plot he is unwittingly engaged in furthering. As the story develops, Shaw is used by his puppet-masters to successfully murder various people around the world, each murder either furthering his own post-war career as a successful newspaperman or the goals of the Russians and Chinese. The book comes to a shocking climax at the 1960 nominating convention in Madison Square Garden in New York City.

Raymond Shaw

Raymond Shaw, the anguished and doomed protagonist of the novel, had "...large glaucous eyes with very large whites, like those of a carousel horse pursued by the Erinyes, those female avengers of antiquity." -- page 32

• "It was not that Raymond was hard to like. He was impossible to like." -- page 33

• "His pose, had it been executed in oils, might have been called "The Young Duke among the Fishmongers." -- page 47

Characteristic style and quirks

The novel offers many fine examples of the traits and stylistic tricks that were typical of all of Condon's works, among them, as the playwright George Axelrod once put it, "the madness of his similies, the lunacy of his metaphors". A selection from The Manchurian Candidate:

• "The sergeant's rage-daubed face would shine like a ripped-out heart flung onto stones in the moonlight,"

• "The sergeant's account of his past was ancient in its form and confusingly dramatic, as perhaps would have been a game of three-level chess between Richard Burbage and Sacha Guidy."

• "The effects of the narcotics, techniques, and suggestions... achieved a result that approximated the impact an entire twenty-five-cent jar of F. W. Woolworth vanishing cream might have on vanishing an aircraft carrier of the Forrestal class when rubbed into the armor plate."

Accusation of plagiarism

In 1998 a California software engineer noticed several paragraphs in The Manchurian Candidate that appeared nearly identical to portions of the celebrated 1934 novel I, Claudius by the English writer Robert Graves. She wrote about the apparent plagiarism on her website but her discovery went unnoticed by most of the world until Adair Lara, a longtime San Francisco Chronicle staff writer, wrote a lengthy article about the accusation in 2003. Reprinting the paragraphs in question, she also solicited the opinion of a British "forensic linguist", who concluded that Condon had unquestionably plagiarized at least two paragraphs of Graves's work. By this time, however, more than seven years had passed since Condon's death and Lara's article also failed to generate any literary interest outside the Chronicle.