Talk:Satanic ritual abuse: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Neil Brick (add comment) |
imported>Robert H. Stockman |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::Does this mean that I am not allowed to edit the article? If so, I object. I have worked to add appropriate sources to the article and have not edit warred, so I do not see why I should not be allowed to add appropriate sources. The only way to have a fair article is to allow those with different perspectives to edit it.[[User:Neil Brick|Neil Brick]] 17:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | ::Does this mean that I am not allowed to edit the article? If so, I object. I have worked to add appropriate sources to the article and have not edit warred, so I do not see why I should not be allowed to add appropriate sources. The only way to have a fair article is to allow those with different perspectives to edit it.[[User:Neil Brick|Neil Brick]] 17:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::That is correct; you can comment on the talk page, but cannot edit the article. You can always appeal this, if you'd like. [[User:Robert H. Stockman|Robert Stockman]] 17:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:05, 7 April 2009
Neutrality
I think the last few weeks of discussions have been helpful to hash out the various aspects of this article. At this point I would ask Neil Brick to refrain from editing the article itself and let Howard, Gareth, and others finish it. Neil can continue to post his comments on the Talk page and make his point of view clear there. But I will defer to the others to create an article that is accurate, fair, and reasonably neutral. "Neutral" in this case does not mean equal time for both sides because this does not appear to be a case where the two sides deserve equal weight. Thank you, everyone, for retaining civility and maximizing collaboration while we worked through a series of difficult issues. Robert Stockman 16:07, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- I am considering the above comment by editor User:Robert H. Stockman to be a ruling. D. Matt Innis 15:15, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- Does this mean that I am not allowed to edit the article? If so, I object. I have worked to add appropriate sources to the article and have not edit warred, so I do not see why I should not be allowed to add appropriate sources. The only way to have a fair article is to allow those with different perspectives to edit it.Neil Brick 17:03, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
- That is correct; you can comment on the talk page, but cannot edit the article. You can always appeal this, if you'd like. Robert Stockman 17:05, 7 April 2009 (UTC)