Talk:Licensing parents: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(create talk page)
 
imported>Larry Sanger
(→‎Needs balance: new section)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{subpages}}
{{subpages}}
==Article by [[User:Robert O'Connor|Bob O'Connor]] wiki-formatted by --[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 00:31, 12 October 2008 (UTC)==
==Article by [[User:Robert O'Connor|Bob O'Connor]] wiki-formatted by --[[User:Anthony.Sebastian|Anthony.Sebastian]] 00:31, 12 October 2008 (UTC)==
== Needs balance ==
On a quick scan I couldn't find any mention of another point of view on this subject.  Let's get represent some arguments and research on the other side, please.  Right now all I find is: "also look at the negatives to the potential practice. Violations of personal freedom, of civil or human rights, and of the potential misuse of governments being involved in the process are discussed."  Yes--elaborate that thought.  :-)
Also, the ''arguments'' here are first and foremost philosophical, so shouldn't the Philosophy Workgroup be billed first? --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 05:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:15, 11 October 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition An idea for controlling the quality or quantity of a population. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Sociology, Philosophy and History [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Article by Bob O'Connor wiki-formatted by --Anthony.Sebastian 00:31, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Needs balance

On a quick scan I couldn't find any mention of another point of view on this subject. Let's get represent some arguments and research on the other side, please. Right now all I find is: "also look at the negatives to the potential practice. Violations of personal freedom, of civil or human rights, and of the potential misuse of governments being involved in the process are discussed." Yes--elaborate that thought.  :-)

Also, the arguments here are first and foremost philosophical, so shouldn't the Philosophy Workgroup be billed first? --Larry Sanger 05:15, 12 October 2008 (UTC)