imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov |
imported>Dmitrii Kouznetsov |
Line 87: |
Line 87: |
| (1) '''Let''' each of <math>~F_1~</math> and <math>~F_2~</math> is [[holomorphic function]] | | (1) '''Let''' each of <math>~F_1~</math> and <math>~F_2~</math> is [[holomorphic function]] |
| on <math>~\mathbb{C}^{\prime}=\mathbb{C}\backslash (-\infty,-2]</math>, | | on <math>~\mathbb{C}^{\prime}=\mathbb{C}\backslash (-\infty,-2]</math>, |
| satisfying conditions
| | satisfying conditions |
|
| |
|
| (2) <math> F(0)=1</math> | | (2) <math> F(0)=1</math> |
Line 96: |
Line 96: |
| <math>~\mathbb{S}=~\{x+\mathrm{i} y|-2<x\le 1, y\in \mathbb{R} \}</math> | | <math>~\mathbb{S}=~\{x+\mathrm{i} y|-2<x\le 1, y\in \mathbb{R} \}</math> |
|
| |
|
| '''Then''' <math> ~F_1=F_2~ </math> | | '''Then''' <math> ~F_1=F_2~ </math> |
|
| |
|
| ====Proof of Theorem T4==== | | ====Proof of Theorem T4==== |
Henryk Trappmann 's theorems
This is approach to the Second part of the Theorem 0, which is still absent in the main text.
Copypast from http://math.eretrandre.org/tetrationforum/showthread.php?tid=165&pid=2458#pid2458
Theorem T1. (about Gamma function)
Let
be holomorphic on the right half plane
let
for all
such that
.
Let
.
Let
be bounded on the strip
.
Then
is the gamma function.
Proof, see in Reinhold Remmert, "Funktionnentheorie", Springer, 1995. As reference is given: H. Wielandt 1939. (Mein Gott, so old reference!)
Consider function
on the right half plane, it also satisfies equation
Hence,
has a meromorphic continuation to
;
and the poles are allowed only at non–positive integer values of the argument.
While
, we have
,
hence,
has a holomorphic continuation to 0 and also to each
,
by
.
In the range
,
is pounded. It is because function
is bounded there.
Then
is also restricted on
,
because
and
have the same values on
. Now
, hence
is bounded on whole
, and by the
Liouville Theorem,
. Hence,
and
.
(end of proof)
Theorem T2 (about exponential)
Let
be solution of
,
, bounded in the strip
.
Then
is exponential on base
, id est,
.
Proof.
We know that every other solution must be of the form
where
is a 1-periodic holomorphic function.
This can roughly be seen by showing periodicity of
.
,
where
is also a 1-periodic function,
While each of
and
is bounded on
,
must be bounded too.
Theorem T3 (about Fibbonachi)
Let
.
Let
Let
Let
Then
Discussion. Id est,
is Fibbonachi function.
Theorem T4 (about tetration)
First intent to formulate
Let
.
Let each of
and
satisfies conditions
for ![{\displaystyle \Re (z)>-2}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/df6a699142ca49b6c822412ec5031310948da6de)
is holomorphic function, bounded in the strip
.
Then
Second intent to formulate
(0) Let
.
(1) Let each of
and
is holomorphic function
on
,
satisfying conditions
(2)
(3)
for
(4)
is bounded on
Then
Proof of Theorem T4
Lemma 1
(0) Let
.
(1) Let
be holomorphic function
on
,
such that
(2)
(3)
for
(4)
is bounded on
Let
Then
Proof of Lemma 1
Proof of theorem T4
Discussion
Such
is unique tetration on the base
.