Talk:Inflation: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Definition: new section) |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→Definition: removed redundant header) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Most of the paragraphs in this article could be expanded by drawing further on the article's references. Alternatively, further explanatory matter could be provided by other (as yet unwritten) articles such as [[monetarism]], [[ incomes policies]] and [[economic history]]. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 10:52, 10 September 2008 (CDT) | :Most of the paragraphs in this article could be expanded by drawing further on the article's references. Alternatively, further explanatory matter could be provided by other (as yet unwritten) articles such as [[monetarism]], [[ incomes policies]] and [[economic history]]. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 10:52, 10 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
==Definition== | ==Definition== | ||
Nick, I see that you deleted my addition with no comment whatsoever. I think that this is rather rude, in that I made a good-faith effort to improve the article. Tell me, don't *YOU* think it would be nice to define "inflation" first? And, if not, why not? [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 16:43, 10 September 2008 (CDT) | Nick, I see that you deleted my addition with no comment whatsoever. I think that this is rather rude, in that I made a good-faith effort to improve the article. Tell me, don't *YOU* think it would be nice to define "inflation" first? And, if not, why not? [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 16:43, 10 September 2008 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 15:44, 10 September 2008
- Most of the paragraphs in this article could be expanded by drawing further on the article's references. Alternatively, further explanatory matter could be provided by other (as yet unwritten) articles such as monetarism, incomes policies and economic history. Nick Gardner 10:52, 10 September 2008 (CDT)
Definition
Nick, I see that you deleted my addition with no comment whatsoever. I think that this is rather rude, in that I made a good-faith effort to improve the article. Tell me, don't *YOU* think it would be nice to define "inflation" first? And, if not, why not? Hayford Peirce 16:43, 10 September 2008 (CDT)