Talk:History of music psychology: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ulrich Terstiege
No edit summary
imported>Ulrich Terstiege
No edit summary
Line 10: Line 10:
Part II describes the results of the two papers by Sachs. Here I wonder if his results are today still accepted by leading researchers.
Part II describes the results of the two papers by Sachs. Here I wonder if his results are today still accepted by leading researchers.
Does anybody know?
Does anybody know?
[[User:Ulrich Terstiege|Ulrich Terstiege]] 2 August 2008
[[User:Ulrich Terstiege|Ulrich Terstiege]] 2 August 2008

Revision as of 13:15, 3 August 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition:  Description of the historical development of research in music psychology. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories:  Music, Psychology and History [Editors asked to check categories]
 Talk Archive:  none  English language variant:  British English

My plan is to divide the talk into two parts.

Part I gives an overview of the history of systematic musicology following §2,3 and 4 of the paper of Leman and Schneider and it includes a description of the notion of Gestalt psychology and the development of its role in musicology. I also want to give a brief summary of, resp. to mention

  1. the work of von Helmholtz,
  2. Darwin's view of the function of music and Spencer's different opinion,
  3. the cognitive model of perception of music given by Knoblauch in 1888.

Part II describes the results of the two papers by Sachs. Here I wonder if his results are today still accepted by leading researchers. Does anybody know?

Ulrich Terstiege 2 August 2008

Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:History_of_music_psychology&oldid=498854"