George Berkeley: Difference between revisions
imported>Gareth Leng No edit summary |
imported>Gareth Leng |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
===Berkeley and infinitesimals=== | ===Berkeley and infinitesimals=== | ||
In 1734 Bishop Berkeley published a tract called ''The Analyst''. In this, the new [[calculus]] of [[Newton]] and [[Leibniz]] was attacked and especially the concept of "fixed infinitesimal" set forth by Isaac Newton in the [[Principia]] and in an appendix to the [[Opticks]]. Since the concept of an infinitely small, and yet finite, quantity was still fairly muddled and confused, Berkeley, although not a mathematician by training, made an extremely effective attack. His arguments provoked controversy among mathematicians and led to the clarification of central ideas underlying the new theory. | In 1734 Bishop Berkeley published a tract called ''The Analyst''. In this, the new [[calculus]] of [[Newton]] and [[Leibniz]] was attacked and especially the concept of "fixed infinitesimal" set forth by Isaac Newton in the [[Principia]] and in an appendix to the [[Opticks]]. Since the concept of an infinitely small, and yet finite, quantity was still fairly muddled and confused, Berkeley, although not a mathematician by training, made an extremely effective attack. His arguments provoked controversy among mathematicians and led to the clarification of central ideas underlying the new theory. | ||
<ref>George Berkeley (1734)[http://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Berkeley/Analyst/Analyst.html THE | |||
ANALYST;] or, a discourse addressed to an Infidel Mathematician wherein it is examined whether the Object, Principles, and Inferences of the modern Analysis are more distinctly conceived, or more evidently deduced, than Religious Mysteries and Points of Faith</ref> | |||
== External links == | == External links == |
Revision as of 02:56, 16 February 2011
George Berkeley (12 March 1685 – 14 January 1753), also known as Bishop Berkeley, was an Irish philosopher. He is best known for developing an early form of idealism, according to which the only things which exist are minds and the ideas which they perceive. The University of California, Berkeley, and the city that grew up around it were both named after him.
|
Contributions to philosophy
Berkeleyan idealism
"But, say you, surely there is nothing easier than for me to imagine trees, for instance, in a park [. . .] and nobody by to perceive them. [...] The objects of sense exist only when they are perceived; the trees therefore are in the garden [. . .] no longer than while there is somebody by to perceive them."
The central thesis of Berkeley's idealism was that only minds and the ideas which they perceive exist. This committed him to immaterialism, the position that there are no material substances, where a substance is something which could exist even if nothing else did. According to Berkeley, objects like trees and chairs existed, but they could not exist independently of being perceived by a mind. He summarised this position with his famous dictum, "Esse est percipi" ("To be is to be perceived").
This thesis has been commonly expressed as "If a tree falls in a forest and no one is there to hear it, does it make a sound?" Berkeley's ultimate answer to this was that there is always a mind that perceives it - the mind of God.
Berkeley and infinitesimals
In 1734 Bishop Berkeley published a tract called The Analyst. In this, the new calculus of Newton and Leibniz was attacked and especially the concept of "fixed infinitesimal" set forth by Isaac Newton in the Principia and in an appendix to the Opticks. Since the concept of an infinitely small, and yet finite, quantity was still fairly muddled and confused, Berkeley, although not a mathematician by training, made an extremely effective attack. His arguments provoked controversy among mathematicians and led to the clarification of central ideas underlying the new theory. [2]
External links
- Berkeley’s central arguments for immaterialism, PhilosoFiles
References
- ↑ George Berkeley (1710) A Treatise Concerning the Principles of Human Knowledge
- ↑ George Berkeley (1734)[http://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Berkeley/Analyst/Analyst.html THE ANALYST;] or, a discourse addressed to an Infidel Mathematician wherein it is examined whether the Object, Principles, and Inferences of the modern Analysis are more distinctly conceived, or more evidently deduced, than Religious Mysteries and Points of Faith