CZ:Proposals/Citizendium Mobile: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Robert Badgett
imported>Graham Proud
Line 6: Line 6:


== Complete explanation ==
== Complete explanation ==
''A complete, clear, feasible, and (as applicable) step-by-step explanation of the proposal. Or, if an issue: a complete and fair explanation of the competing positions that the decisionmakers are being asked to consider.''
More than an year ago I saw how SharePoint sites automatically render in both desktop and mobile browsers.  I thought we could do the same thing so I submitted a proposal. Now it looks like it has already been done - have a look at [http://wikizap.mobi/encitizendium/]


== Reasoning ==
== Reasoning ==

Revision as of 20:07, 1 November 2009

[Note to the proposer: please delete these lines after reading! Please bear in mind that if you do not volunteer to be the driver of the proposal, and you do not fill it out in great detail, then your proposal or issue will be addressed only if a driver is found. So, if you really do want your work not to go to waste, please do help locate a driver for your proposal. Thanks! Now please delete the foregoing message!]

This proposal is presently driverless. Why not become its driver?
You can sign up on its proposal record, which may be found on the driverless proposals page.


Driver: None

Complete explanation

More than an year ago I saw how SharePoint sites automatically render in both desktop and mobile browsers. I thought we could do the same thing so I submitted a proposal. Now it looks like it has already been done - have a look at [1]

Reasoning

The reasoning behind the proposal, or behind the various options offered in the issue. Make sure it is clear what problem you're trying to solve (or opportunity you're trying to leverage), and the proposal would solve the problem.

Implementation

A practical "to do list" type explanation of how the proposal will be implemented, and who will implement it. If there is no one to implement the proposal (as, for example, with many technical or recruitment proposals), then it is automatically declined.

Discussion

A discussion section, to which anyone may contribute.

If someone with the technical expertise to implement this is interested, I'd say go for it. Otherwise, this seems too far down the priority list to worry about for another year or so. Warren Schudy 12:51, 23 February 2008 (CST)

I'm thinking that if all of the technical resources and volunteers could be corralled into a single unified workgroup via my proposal, we could expedite something like this. --Robert W King 15:02, 7 March 2008 (CST)

Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only)

Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):

I would like to see this eventually happen. This has already been done for WP (see http://pda.wapedia.mobi/en/) and maybe that developer (http://pda.wapedia.mobi/en/Wapedia_Wapedia) would do want to do the same for CZ. - Robert Badgett 09:47, 12 March 2008 (CDT)