Talk:Animalier/Catalogs: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger (New page: Two pointers here: this best put on a CZ:Related Articles page, not a catalog (if it's just going to contain names, links, and "definitions"); and the r template has contains an asteri...) |
imported>Aleta Curry (Sigh. Clear as mud, mon ami.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Two pointers here: this best put on a [[CZ:Related Articles]] page, not a catalog (if it's just going to contain names, links, and "definitions"); and the r template has contains an asterisk, so you don't have to type the asterisk before the template. Please fix this...and your other catalogs...! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:36, 22 February 2008 (CST) | Two pointers here: this best put on a [[CZ:Related Articles]] page, not a catalog (if it's just going to contain names, links, and "definitions"); and the r template has contains an asterisk, so you don't have to type the asterisk before the template. Please fix this...and your other catalogs...! --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 14:36, 22 February 2008 (CST) | ||
:Related articles are said to be in three distinct types, Parent, Child, Other related. It also says, "Taken together, "Related Articles" pages will compose a hand-created category scheme." ''What''?? I mean, ''I beg your pardon?'' | |||
:What will and will not eventually become a "catalog" still isn't clear to me. i.e. there might be only a definition for the present, but how will the data be finally organised? | |||
:Well, look, I'll just put everything under related articles from here on in, because I still don't get this. | |||
:[[User:Aleta Curry|Aleta Curry]] 15:24, 22 February 2008 (CST) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:24, 22 February 2008
Two pointers here: this best put on a CZ:Related Articles page, not a catalog (if it's just going to contain names, links, and "definitions"); and the r template has contains an asterisk, so you don't have to type the asterisk before the template. Please fix this...and your other catalogs...! --Larry Sanger 14:36, 22 February 2008 (CST)
- Related articles are said to be in three distinct types, Parent, Child, Other related. It also says, "Taken together, "Related Articles" pages will compose a hand-created category scheme." What?? I mean, I beg your pardon?
- What will and will not eventually become a "catalog" still isn't clear to me. i.e. there might be only a definition for the present, but how will the data be finally organised?
- Well, look, I'll just put everything under related articles from here on in, because I still don't get this.
- Aleta Curry 15:24, 22 February 2008 (CST)