CZ:Proposals/Constabulary: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Anthony Argyriou (remove date - proposal submitted to Constabulary, no action reported to me.) |
imported>Jitse Niesen (move "Removal of educational requirements for the Constabulary" here from New queue) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
These are proposals that will go (or are now) before the [[CZ:Constabulary|Constabulary]]. | These are proposals that will go (or are now) before the [[CZ:Constabulary|Constabulary]]. | ||
== Removal of educational requirements for the Constabulary == | |||
{{proposal | |||
|Brief descriptive title = Should we remove the educational prequisites in place in order to be considered for the Constabulary? | |||
|Summary of proposal = This proposal argues that the educational minimum requirement (A College degree) should be dropped for those being considered for the constabulary. The rationale is two-fold; First, an attempt of increasing our pool of potential constables (Something which will become more important as we grow) and second, on moral grounds there is little distinction maturity wise (Which essentially is all it takes to make a good constable) between those who have underwent a college degree and those who haven't. | |||
|Name and date of original proposer = [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 15:57, 7 May 2008 (CDT) | |||
|Username of driver = [[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] | |||
|Next step = I would like to see debate on this to see where the community as a whole stands. Overall, I don't think it should be much of an issue. | |||
|Target date for next step = May 25th (Roughly) | |||
|Notes = | |||
}} | |||
== Change to reversion policy == | == Change to reversion policy == |
Revision as of 07:04, 9 June 2008
These are proposals that will go (or are now) before the Constabulary.
Removal of educational requirements for the Constabulary
Summary: This proposal argues that the educational minimum requirement (A College degree) should be dropped for those being considered for the constabulary. The rationale is two-fold; First, an attempt of increasing our pool of potential constables (Something which will become more important as we grow) and second, on moral grounds there is little distinction maturity wise (Which essentially is all it takes to make a good constable) between those who have underwent a college degree and those who haven't.
| ||||
Complete proposal |
Change to reversion policy
Summary: CZ:Professionalism#Reversion and deletion as unprofessional behaviors says deletion of others' work without explanation is clearly unprofessional, and deletion of more than 50 words can result in a warning, followed by a ban., and similary discourages reverting of edits without explanation. The proposal is to rewrite the section to emphasize that it is the lack of explanation which is the offence, not the mere act of reverting or deleting others' work.
| ||||||
Complete proposal |
Proposals System Navigation (advanced users only) | |
|
Proposal lists (some planned pages are still blank):
|