Archive:Approval and Feedback: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
imported>Larry Sanger |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Personnel== | ==Personnel== | ||
Here is an alphabetical list of the voting members of the Approval and Feedback Workgroup. Anyone may view and comment on proposals before this group, on [[CZ:Proposals/Approval_and_Feedback|this Proposals System page]]. | |||
* [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] | * [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] | ||
* [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] | * [[User:D. Matt Innis|D. Matt Innis]] | ||
Revision as of 17:40, 25 March 2008
| Citizendium Initiatives | ||
|---|---|---|
| Eduzendium | Featured Article | Recruitment | Subpages | Core Articles | Uncategorized pages | Requested Articles | Feedback Requests | Wanted Articles |
|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"| |}
This is the future home of an Approval and Feedback Initiative: it's all about recognizing excellence.
Personnel
Here is an alphabetical list of the voting members of the Approval and Feedback Workgroup. Anyone may view and comment on proposals before this group, on this Proposals System page.
- Larry Sanger
- D. Matt Innis
- David Shapinsky
- Carl Hewitt
- Martin Baldwin-Edwards
- Supten Sarbadhikari
- Anthony.Sebastian
- David E. Volk
- Jaime Nubiola
- Roger Lohmann
- J. Noel Chiappa
- (add your name if seriously interested, i.e., if you're interested in doing real work for the initiative)
Mailing list
The mailing list for the Approval and Feedback group, acting as a subcommittee of the Editorial Council and with authority to approve A&F proposals, is cz-approfeed. The list archives are open to read, but only specifically listed members of the A&F group can subscribe.
Problems with current (March 2008) article approval system
- Rate of approval too slow
- Too much confusion about what the process is
- No simple, prominently-placed version of instructions
- No easy way to get the word out to specific sets of editors that we want reviews
- No set way for editors to simply *review* an article and thereby enumerate what an article needs in order to be approvable