Talk:Catalytic reforming/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok m (→description of Feed stream in diagram: Response to Guido) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:Thanks for your comment, Guido. Changing a drawing requires quite a bit of time and effort. So, instead, I changed the wording in the text to reflect your comment. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 07:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | :Thanks for your comment, Guido. Changing a drawing requires quite a bit of time and effort. So, instead, I changed the wording in the text to reflect your comment. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 07:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
== I probably should have nominated along with naptha...nominating now == | |||
Since they are rather interdependent. Your call, but I'd move the TOC to the top to remove whitespace. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 18:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:26, 2 August 2010
NOTICE, please do not remove from top of page. | |
I released this article to Wikipedia. In particular, the identical text that appears there is of my sole authorship. Therefore, no credit for Wikipedia content on the Citizendium applies. | |
Check the history of edits to see who inserted this notice. |
I was the original sole author of this Wikipedia article
I copied it to here at Citizendium as is with the Wikipedia title ... and will now delete all of the Wikipedia links and certain sections. I will also be making some wording changes. - Milton Beychok 18:11, 29 January 2008 (CST)
description of Feed stream in diagram
In the text, the feed stream for catalytic reforming is described as "heavy naphtha". I would recommend to use the same description in the schematic drawing, instead of "Dehexanized Naphtha", in order to prevent confusions. Guido van der Lans 08:33, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comment, Guido. Changing a drawing requires quite a bit of time and effort. So, instead, I changed the wording in the text to reflect your comment. Milton Beychok 07:03, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
I probably should have nominated along with naptha...nominating now
Since they are rather interdependent. Your call, but I'd move the TOC to the top to remove whitespace. Howard C. Berkowitz 18:26, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Engineering Category Check
- Chemistry Category Check
- Nonstub Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Internal Articles
- Engineering Nonstub Articles
- Engineering Advanced Articles
- Engineering Internal Articles
- Chemistry Nonstub Articles
- Chemistry Advanced Articles
- Chemistry Internal Articles
- Engineering Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Chemistry Underlinked Articles
- Chemical Engineering tag