User:Milton Beychok/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Milton Beychok
No edit summary
imported>Milton Beychok
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
====Reducing carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants====
====Reducing carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants====


The leading technology for significantly reducing the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from coal-fired power plants is known as ''[[Carbon capture and sequestration]]'' (CCS). It is currently (2008) regarded as the technology which could significantly reduce coal-fired power plant CO<sub>2</sub> emissions while also allowing the use of the Earth's aboundant coal resources to provide the increasing  global need for energy. However, CCS technology is still in development and it is not expected to be ready for widespread commercial implementation on a large scale until about 2020.<ref name=EIACHAP7/><ref name=IEATanaka>[http://www.iea.org/textbase/speech/2008/Tanaka/commentsccs.pdf Launch of ''CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option'' publication] (Comments by Nobuo Tanaka, Executive Director of International Energy Agency, October 2008)</ref>  
The leading technology for significantly reducing the CO<sub>2</sub> emissions from coal-fired power plants is known as ''[[Carbon capture and sequestration]]'' (CCS). It is currently (2008) regarded as the technology which could significantly reduce coal-fired power plant CO<sub>2</sub> emissions while also allowing the use of the Earth's aboundant coal resources to provide the increasing  global need for energy. However, CCS technology is still in development and it is not expected to be ready for widespread commercial implementation on a large scale until about 2020.<ref name=EIACHAP7/><ref name=IEATanaka>[http://www.iea.org/textbase/speech/2008/Tanaka/commentsccs.pdf Launch of ''CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option'' publication] (Comments by Nobuo Tanaka, Executive Director of International Energy Agency, October 2008)</ref><ref name=IEAGreenOrg>[http://www.ieagreen.org.uk/glossies/GHGT9%20Reports%20CD.pdf IEA Grenhouse Gas (GHG) 2008 Brochures]</ref>  


It involves capturing the CO<sub>2</sub> produced by the combustion of coal and storing it in deep ocean areas or in underground geological structures deep within the Earth's upper crust.  
It involves capturing the CO<sub>2</sub> produced by the combustion of coal and storing it in deep ocean areas or in underground geological structures deep within the Earth's upper crust.  
The capture of the CO<sub>2</sub> from the coal combustion flue gases can be accomplished by using absorbents such as amines (see [[Amine gas treating]]). The CO<sub>2</sub> is then compressed into a [[supercritical fluid]] at about 150 [[atmosphere (unit)|atmospheres]] (15 MPA), dehydrated and transported to the storage sites for injection into the underground or undersea reservoirs. Compressing the CO<sub>2</sub> into a supercritical fluid greatly increases its [[density]] which greatly reduces its volume as compared to transporting and storing the CO<sub>2</sub> as a gas.
The capture of the CO<sub>2</sub> from the coal combustion flue gases can be accomplished by using absorbents such as amines (see [[Amine gas treating]]). The CO<sub>2</sub> is then compressed into a [[supercritical fluid]] at about 150 [[atmosphere (unit)|atmospheres]] (15 MPA), dehydrated and transported to the storage sites for injection into the underground or undersea reservoirs. Compressing the CO<sub>2</sub> into a supercritical fluid greatly increases its [[density]] which greatly reduces its volume as compared to transporting and storing the CO<sub>2</sub> as a gas.


Since the current global emissions of carbon dioxide from all energy supply sources is 28 Gt per year, the scale of CO<sub>2</sub> storage required to make a major difference in those emissions is massive. For example, based on a CO<sub>2</sub> emission factor of 1 kg per kWh, 570 coal-fired plants, each producing 1000 MW of electricity, would emit about 5 Gt per year of CO<sub>2</sub> into the atmosphere. Storing 5 Gt per year of CO<sub>2</sub> requires injection of about 65 million barrels per day (about 10 x 10<sup>6</sup> cubic meters per day) of supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>.<ref name=MIT/> The worldwide capacity for storing CO<sub>2</sub> in depleted natural gas and crude oil production fields and deep coal seams has been estimated as 1080 Gt which is equivalent to 150 years of the 7 Gt emissions (in 2005) from the worldwide total coal-fired power generation.<ref name=AAPG>[http://aapg.confex.com/aapg/ba2000/techprogram/paper_4952.htm CO2 injection and sequestration in depleted oil and gas fields and deep coal seams: worldwide potential and costs] (S.H. Stevens et al, 2000 International Conference of the [[American Association of Petroleum Geologists]] (AAPGG)</ref>
Since the current global emissions of carbon dioxide from all energy supply sources is 28 Gt per year, the scale of CO<sub>2</sub> storage required to make a major difference in those emissions is massive. For example, based on a CO<sub>2</sub> emission factor of 1 kg per kWh, 570 coal-fired plants, each producing 1000 MW of electricity, would emit about 5 Gt per year of CO<sub>2</sub> into the atmosphere. Storing 5 Gt per year of CO<sub>2</sub> requires injection of about 65 million barrels per day (about 10 x 10<sup>6</sup> cubic meters per day) of supercritical CO<sub>2</sub>.<ref name=MIT/>  
 
The worldwide capacity for storing CO<sub>2</sub> in depleted natural gas and crude oil production fields and in unmineable deep coal seams has been estimated as about 1000 Gt which is equivalent to 140 years of the 7 Gt emissions (in 2005) from the worldwide total coal-fired power generation. In addition, the worldwide capacity in deep saline formations has been estimated to range from 1000 to 10,000 Gt.<ref name=IEAGreenOrg/><ref>[http://aapg.confex.com/aapg/ba2000/techprogram/paper_4952.htm CO2 injection and sequestration in depleted oil and gas fields and deep coal seams: worldwide potential and costs] (S.H. Stevens et al, 2000 International Conference of the [[American Association of Petroleum Geologists]] (AAPGG)</ref>


No matter what governmental regulations are eventually adopted to mitigate the emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> from coal-powered power plants (or other processes involving the combustion of substances containing carbon), there must be successful, integrated large-scale demonstration of the technical, environmental and economic aspects of the major components of a CCS sytem, namely CO<sub>2</sub> capture, transportation and storage. Such an integrated demonstration must also provide a definition of regulatory protocols for sequestration projects including site selection, injection operation, and eventual transfer of custody to public authorities after a period of successful operation.
No matter what governmental regulations are eventually adopted to mitigate the emissions of CO<sub>2</sub> from coal-powered power plants (or other processes involving the combustion of substances containing carbon), there must be successful, integrated large-scale demonstration of the technical, environmental and economic aspects of the major components of a CCS sytem, namely CO<sub>2</sub> capture, transportation and storage. Such an integrated demonstration must also provide a definition of regulatory protocols for sequestration projects including site selection, injection operation, and eventual transfer of custody to public authorities after a period of successful operation.

Revision as of 01:17, 23 December 2008

Reducing carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants

The leading technology for significantly reducing the CO2 emissions from coal-fired power plants is known as Carbon capture and sequestration (CCS). It is currently (2008) regarded as the technology which could significantly reduce coal-fired power plant CO2 emissions while also allowing the use of the Earth's aboundant coal resources to provide the increasing global need for energy. However, CCS technology is still in development and it is not expected to be ready for widespread commercial implementation on a large scale until about 2020.[1][2][3]

It involves capturing the CO2 produced by the combustion of coal and storing it in deep ocean areas or in underground geological structures deep within the Earth's upper crust. The capture of the CO2 from the coal combustion flue gases can be accomplished by using absorbents such as amines (see Amine gas treating). The CO2 is then compressed into a supercritical fluid at about 150 atmospheres (15 MPA), dehydrated and transported to the storage sites for injection into the underground or undersea reservoirs. Compressing the CO2 into a supercritical fluid greatly increases its density which greatly reduces its volume as compared to transporting and storing the CO2 as a gas.

Since the current global emissions of carbon dioxide from all energy supply sources is 28 Gt per year, the scale of CO2 storage required to make a major difference in those emissions is massive. For example, based on a CO2 emission factor of 1 kg per kWh, 570 coal-fired plants, each producing 1000 MW of electricity, would emit about 5 Gt per year of CO2 into the atmosphere. Storing 5 Gt per year of CO2 requires injection of about 65 million barrels per day (about 10 x 106 cubic meters per day) of supercritical CO2.[4]

The worldwide capacity for storing CO2 in depleted natural gas and crude oil production fields and in unmineable deep coal seams has been estimated as about 1000 Gt which is equivalent to 140 years of the 7 Gt emissions (in 2005) from the worldwide total coal-fired power generation. In addition, the worldwide capacity in deep saline formations has been estimated to range from 1000 to 10,000 Gt.[3][5]

No matter what governmental regulations are eventually adopted to mitigate the emissions of CO2 from coal-powered power plants (or other processes involving the combustion of substances containing carbon), there must be successful, integrated large-scale demonstration of the technical, environmental and economic aspects of the major components of a CCS sytem, namely CO2 capture, transportation and storage. Such an integrated demonstration must also provide a definition of regulatory protocols for sequestration projects including site selection, injection operation, and eventual transfer of custody to public authorities after a period of successful operation.


  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named EIACHAP7
  2. Launch of CO2 Capture and Storage: A Key Carbon Abatement Option publication (Comments by Nobuo Tanaka, Executive Director of International Energy Agency, October 2008)
  3. 3.0 3.1 IEA Grenhouse Gas (GHG) 2008 Brochures
  4. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named MIT
  5. CO2 injection and sequestration in depleted oil and gas fields and deep coal seams: worldwide potential and costs (S.H. Stevens et al, 2000 International Conference of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPGG)