User:Ragnar Schroder/Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ragnar Schroder
No edit summary
imported>Ragnar Schroder
Line 1: Line 1:
Testing my sandbox:  
Testing my sandbox:  


Line 24: Line 23:
This polynomial has no roots in Q.  However, from the [[fundamental theorem of algebra]] we know that it has exacly two roots in C, and can be written as the product of two first-degree polynomials there - i.e. <math>x^2-5 = (x-r_0)(x-r_1), r_0, r_1 \in  C</math>.  From direct inspection of the polynomial we also realize that <math>r_0 = -r_1</math>.
This polynomial has no roots in Q.  However, from the [[fundamental theorem of algebra]] we know that it has exacly two roots in C, and can be written as the product of two first-degree polynomials there - i.e. <math>x^2-5 = (x-r_0)(x-r_1), r_0, r_1 \in  C</math>.  From direct inspection of the polynomial we also realize that <math>r_0 = -r_1</math>.


We now look for the smallest subfield of C that contains Q and both <math>r_0</math> and <math>-r_0</math>, which is L = { <math>   a+b r_0, a,b \in Q  </math> }.  Since <math>r_0^2 = 5 \in Q</math>,  all products and sums are well defined.  This field is then the smallest extension of Q by the roots of <math>\alpha</math>.
L = <math>\lbrace a+b r_0, a,b \in Q  \rbrace </math> is the smallest subfield of C that contains Q and both <math>r_0</math> and <math>-r_0</math>.
 
Now, in order to find the Galois group,  we need to look at all possible .


The are exactly 2 automorphisms of L that leave every element of Q alone: the null automorphism and the map <math>a+b r_0  \rightarrow a - b r_0</math>.


Now, in order to find the Galois group,  we need to look at all possible automorphisms of L that leave every element of Q alone.
Under composition of automorphisms, these two automorphisms together form a group  isomorphic to <math>S_2</math>,  the group of permutations of two objects.


The only such automorphisms are the null automorphism and the map <math>a+b r_0  \rightarrow a - b r_0</math>.
The sought for Galois group is therefore <math>S_2</math>, which has no nontrivial subgroups.


Under composition of automorphisms,  these two automorphisms together are isomorphic to the group <math>S_2</math>,  the group of permutations of two objects.
This group has no nontrivial subgroups.  


The sought for Galois group is therefore <math>S_2</math>.
Two requirements (known as "seperability" and "normality") need to be satisfied in order for the Galois correspondence to work.  Both happen to be fulfilled in this case,  so we may invoke the Galois correspondence,  and conclude that no intermediate field extension exists.

Revision as of 00:30, 20 December 2007

Testing my sandbox:


1995: 0,28 grader 1997: 0,36 grader 1998: 0,52 grader

2001: 0,40 grader 2002: 0,46 grader 2003: 0,46 grader 2004: 0,43 grader 2005: 0,48 grader 2006: 0,42 grader 2007: 0,41 grader

ÆØÅ æøå


The Galois group of a polynomial - a basic example

As an example, let us look at the second-degree polynomial , with the coefficients {-5,0,1} viewed as elements of Q.

This polynomial has no roots in Q. However, from the fundamental theorem of algebra we know that it has exacly two roots in C, and can be written as the product of two first-degree polynomials there - i.e. . From direct inspection of the polynomial we also realize that .

L = is the smallest subfield of C that contains Q and both and .

Now, in order to find the Galois group, we need to look at all possible .

The are exactly 2 automorphisms of L that leave every element of Q alone: the null automorphism and the map .

Under composition of automorphisms, these two automorphisms together form a group isomorphic to , the group of permutations of two objects.

The sought for Galois group is therefore , which has no nontrivial subgroups.

This group has no nontrivial subgroups.

Two requirements (known as "seperability" and "normality") need to be satisfied in order for the Galois correspondence to work. Both happen to be fulfilled in this case, so we may invoke the Galois correspondence, and conclude that no intermediate field extension exists.