File talk:1897MCK-WIZ.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen
(search for sources is what historians love to do)
imported>Robert W King
No edit summary
 
Line 3: Line 3:
:::Well, that hardly has anything to do with the wizard of oz then. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 08:59, 17 November 2007 (CST)
:::Well, that hardly has anything to do with the wizard of oz then. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 08:59, 17 November 2007 (CST)
::::it helps answer the question, what are the sources for the book? [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 09:21, 17 November 2007 (CST)
::::it helps answer the question, what are the sources for the book? [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 09:21, 17 November 2007 (CST)
:::::Just because an author includes a witch in a story does not mean they are thinking of politicians. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 09:27, 17 November 2007 (CST)

Latest revision as of 10:27, 17 November 2007

What does the small print say? Are you absolutely sure this is a Wizard of Oz reference? --Robert W King 08:27, 17 November 2007 (CST)

the cartoon appeared several years before the book; it proves cartoonists depicted politicians as witches. Richard Jensen 08:58, 17 November 2007 (CST)
Well, that hardly has anything to do with the wizard of oz then. --Robert W King 08:59, 17 November 2007 (CST)
it helps answer the question, what are the sources for the book? Richard Jensen 09:21, 17 November 2007 (CST)
Just because an author includes a witch in a story does not mean they are thinking of politicians. --Robert W King 09:27, 17 November 2007 (CST)