Talk:Ideal gas law/Draft: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
imported>Robert W King (→readability: new section) |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
We need to change this back, because only 1 law was started in 1660s. The rest were developed later. | We need to change this back, because only 1 law was started in 1660s. The rest were developed later. | ||
[[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 02:14, 2 November 2007 (CDT) | [[User:David E. Volk|David E. Volk]] 02:14, 2 November 2007 (CDT) | ||
== readability == | |||
This article needs lots of work on explanations, particularly on what the formulas mean what why they're used, and more elaboration on some concepts. I think it needs some narrative work. --[[User:Robert W King|Robert W King]] 14:58, 8 January 2008 (CST) |
Revision as of 14:58, 8 January 2008
Some comments
- IUPAC prescribes lowercase p for pressure.
- Is it necessary to give all forms? In other words can't we expect the reader to know some elementary algebra? (When I went to highschool it was first grade material, student's age around 12 years)
- Molar gas constant R in SI units: 8.314 472 J mol−1K−1 see: http://physics.nist.gov/cgi-bin/cuu/Value?r%7Csearch_for=R Don't you also want to give: R = NA kB ?
- The word "constant" in roman: \mathrm{constant}. Same for mol, K, and atm.
- The name of the law varies. I learned in school "law of Boyle and Gay-Lussac".
- You give these worked-out problems, that is OK for a textbook, but for an encyclopedia?
Hope these comments are useful. --Paul Wormer 05:19, 4 October 2007 (CDT)
ideal gas and ideal gas law
Maybe we should merge the two into one article? ideal gas doesn't exist yet, so no real merging is necessary. What do you think? Yuval Langer 06:46, 4 October 2007 (CDT)
Gas laws developed in 1660s
We need to change this back, because only 1 law was started in 1660s. The rest were developed later. David E. Volk 02:14, 2 November 2007 (CDT)
readability
This article needs lots of work on explanations, particularly on what the formulas mean what why they're used, and more elaboration on some concepts. I think it needs some narrative work. --Robert W King 14:58, 8 January 2008 (CST)