CZ Talk:Subpages/Which style?: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Morten Juhl-Johansen Zölde-Fejér No edit summary |
imported>Anton Sweeney (Comment) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I feel that none of the options are good, but that the column-based one is marginally better. The stylesheet looks like Win95, though.<br/> | I feel that none of the options are good, but that the column-based one is marginally better. The stylesheet looks like Win95, though.<br/> | ||
--[[User:Morten Juhl Johansen|Morten Juhl Johansen]] 03:06, 22 August 2007 (CDT) | --[[User:Morten Juhl Johansen|Morten Juhl Johansen]] 03:06, 22 August 2007 (CDT) | ||
I prefer to have all the "navigation stuff" always appear in the same place - across the top works for me, and is in keeping with the Wikimedia software "house style" (at least as used by authors/editors/admins). The vertical one, I think, does ''look'' better - but I think would lead to formatting problems on some articles as images get inadvertantly pushed down the page. [[User:Anton Sweeney|Anton Sweeney]] 10:55, 22 August 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 10:55, 22 August 2007
I feel that none of the options are good, but that the column-based one is marginally better. The stylesheet looks like Win95, though.
--Morten Juhl Johansen 03:06, 22 August 2007 (CDT)
I prefer to have all the "navigation stuff" always appear in the same place - across the top works for me, and is in keeping with the Wikimedia software "house style" (at least as used by authors/editors/admins). The vertical one, I think, does look better - but I think would lead to formatting problems on some articles as images get inadvertantly pushed down the page. Anton Sweeney 10:55, 22 August 2007 (CDT)