Talk:Jennifer Love Hewitt: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Stephen Ewen m (→Skin) |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
Need to add a checklist here... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:27, 30 May 2007 (CDT) | Need to add a checklist here... --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 22:27, 30 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Done. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT) | :Done. [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 22:12, 3 November 2007
Need to add a checklist here... --Larry Sanger 22:27, 30 May 2007 (CDT)
- Done. John Stephenson 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
Skin
I did remove that link because it's possibly a violation of our family-friendly policy, or at least in bad taste. I removed the Wikipedia link as well, since we don't want to be sending Jen fans there! I'm not sure about removing references to nudity, though - one could argue that it is significant that Ms Hewitt has seen an artistic need for such a scene only once in her career. To that end, I see no reason why such information could not be included, provided it is mentioned tastefully and in context. John Stephenson 02:43, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
- No, I really do not think we need links to "Mr. Skin", thank you very much. Also, I think as a matter of course we should avoid links to WP, since at any one time we'd have no assurance of what the article would actually say. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 03:25, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
- My two cents: I agree completely with John Stephenson about the relevance to the reference to nudity. (And this is not because I think Jennifer is very pretty, haha.) The truth is the truth; we can't help it, can we? What we can do, as he says well, is pay due attention to the "tasteful".Jeffrey Scott Bernstein 05:27, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
- The point is moot as the information is wrong anyway. She does not appear nude in Tuxedo[1], although apparently "Mr. Skin" would like one to think so. —Stephen Ewen (Talk) 10:57, 14 October 2007 (CDT)
Categories:
- Article with Definition
- Developing Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Media Developing Articles
- Media Nonstub Articles
- Media Internal Articles
- Topic Informant Developing Articles
- Topic Informant Nonstub Articles
- Topic Informant Internal Articles
- Media Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Topic Informant Underlinked Articles