Talk:Archive:Article of the Week: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Sean Allen (→Article of the Week: re) |
imported>Sean Allen (→Article of the Week: whoops, missed the first three words) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
In addition to "holding up an article to the limelight" to show how good it is, can we have basically the opposite? Should we have a "focus article" of the week that we can collaborate on? [[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 12:09, 25 July 2007 (CDT) | In addition to "holding up an article to the limelight" to show how good it is, can we have basically the opposite? Should we have a "focus article" of the week that we can collaborate on? [[User:Eric M Gearhart|Eric M Gearhart]] 12:09, 25 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
:Why not have both? Wikipedia has a Collaboration of the Week for certain WikiProjects; we could have wiki-wide improvement drives. [[User:Sean Allen|Sean Allen]] 12:48, 25 July 2007 (CDT) | :<s>Why not have both? Wikipedia has a Collaboration of the Week for certain WikiProjects; we could have wiki-wide improvement drives. [[User:Sean Allen|Sean Allen]] 12:48, 25 July 2007 (CDT)</s> Whoops, I mis-read your post. I think it'd be a great idea to have a focus article. (: [[User:Sean Allen|Sean Allen]] 12:50, 25 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 11:50, 25 July 2007
Article of the Week
Larry, Citizendium, etc al,
In addition to "holding up an article to the limelight" to show how good it is, can we have basically the opposite? Should we have a "focus article" of the week that we can collaborate on? Eric M Gearhart 12:09, 25 July 2007 (CDT)
Why not have both? Wikipedia has a Collaboration of the Week for certain WikiProjects; we could have wiki-wide improvement drives. Sean Allen 12:48, 25 July 2007 (CDT)Whoops, I mis-read your post. I think it'd be a great idea to have a focus article. (: Sean Allen 12:50, 25 July 2007 (CDT)