Perl/Code: Difference between revisions
< Perl
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos m (Perl example 4 moved to Perl/example 4: Attachments go to subpages) |
imported>Aleksander Stos m (category cleanup) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
This however requires that a valid Perl executable exists in <code>/usr/bin/</code> or the shell will produce an error. The '-w' option is always recommended, it will direct Perl to produce warnings about unsafe code such as using undeclared variables, and other potential traps. | This however requires that a valid Perl executable exists in <code>/usr/bin/</code> or the shell will produce an error. The '-w' option is always recommended, it will direct Perl to produce warnings about unsafe code such as using undeclared variables, and other potential traps. | ||
Revision as of 11:54, 7 January 2008
In a Linux/Unix environment it has become standard practise to include a special comment in a script's first line, which will direct the command interpreter (shell) where to find the executable, the so-called "hash bang" line. Usually the complete path to the executable is written, thus making this line in the script dependent on the host's file system structure.
Example:
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
# script 'tst'
print "Hello, world!\n";
Now, instead of running
$ perl tst
you can run just the script itself:
$ ./tst
which will produce the expected
Hello, world!
This however requires that a valid Perl executable exists in /usr/bin/
or the shell will produce an error. The '-w' option is always recommended, it will direct Perl to produce warnings about unsafe code such as using undeclared variables, and other potential traps.