Talk:Oral History: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Richard Jensen No edit summary |
imported>Subpagination Bot m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details)) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ | {{subpages}} | ||
}} | |||
Does oral history in relation to medicine get a mention? --even though it really is another article. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 21:59, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | Does oral history in relation to medicine get a mention? --even though it really is another article. [[User:Thomas E Kelly|-Tom Kelly]] [[User talk:Thomas E Kelly|(Talk)]] 21:59, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
::do you mean doctors interviewing patients? or historians interviewing doctors (the latter will get covered if I spot an article)--as in Ophthalmology Oral History Series (reviewed in Bulletin of the History of Medicine 1996 70(1): 167.) I'll add Tomes. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 00:42, 11 April 2007 (CDT) | ::do you mean doctors interviewing patients? or historians interviewing doctors (the latter will get covered if I spot an article)--as in Ophthalmology Oral History Series (reviewed in Bulletin of the History of Medicine 1996 70(1): 167.) I'll add Tomes. [[User:Richard Jensen|Richard Jensen]] 00:42, 11 April 2007 (CDT) |
Latest revision as of 09:22, 12 November 2007
Does oral history in relation to medicine get a mention? --even though it really is another article. -Tom Kelly (Talk) 21:59, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
- do you mean doctors interviewing patients? or historians interviewing doctors (the latter will get covered if I spot an article)--as in Ophthalmology Oral History Series (reviewed in Bulletin of the History of Medicine 1996 70(1): 167.) I'll add Tomes. Richard Jensen 00:42, 11 April 2007 (CDT)