Talk:Social Security in the USA

Article Checklist for "Social Security in the USA"

Workgroup category or categories	Politics Workgroup, History Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status	Stub: no more than a few sentences
Underlinked article?	Yes
Basic cleanup done?	Yes
Checklist last edited by	Derek Harkness 13:13, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.

---

Social Security

has an older history in many other countries besides the USA, you might consider to rename the article to Social Seurity in the US. Contrary to social security in Sweden, the UK, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, France etc etc etc. Robert Tito |  Talk  21:00, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

Request for name change of article

The name of this article is quite wrong. First, it discusses only the USA. Secondly, it fails to explain the major distinctions between social insurance, social assistance and the all-inclusive social security. The article here belongs as a subsidiary page of the USA.

We need a generic article on social security to replace this, with some internationally-relevant analysis.

--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 13:24, 23 May 2007 (CDT)

The article has now been renamed, leaving an empty page for a generic account of Social Security. --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 07:28, 30 May 2007 (CDT)

Sorry, this move is absolutely wrong! It would be like changing the article on the New Deal to New deal. In the USA, the whole *program* is called Social Security, with Caps on *both* words. Trust me.... Hayford Peirce 17:31, 27 September 2007 (CDT)

OK, I'll move it back. It was for consistency with "Social security" as the name of the other article--Martin Baldwin-Edwards 17:44, 27 September 2007 (CDT)

Apparently, we trust you, Hayford, even when you are wrong! ;-)

You are right, of course, that Social Security refers to a U.S. law, but there needs to be room somewhere for Social security which is also an internationally recognized term, with quite different meanings in different countries (some of which refer to social insurance and others have connotations of social solidarity). In the U.S., we tend to refer to the first social insurance programs in Germany as social security also (You'll find the lack of caps in most historical discussions of the matter). (See entries on Bismarck and Theodor Lohmann). And the first change seemed to me to reflect that. Thus, your analogy with the New Deal is partial and incomplete. (There was no international New Deal, or New deal for that matter, although the depression was quite international in scope.) In the U.S., S.S. refers to a specific piece of legislation (The Social Security Act of 1935. As Amended) first adopted in 1935 and amended (quite literally hundreds of times) since then. But there is no Social Security program per se. The Act contains literally dozens of programs NONE of which are named Social Security. The original Act included numerous programs not only social insurance, but also remnants of the Sheppard-Towner Act (1920) and assorted social assistance programs (some of which were taken out in the Welfare Reform of 1995 and some of which remain. The act also includes titles for Medicare, Medicaid and the defunct Title XX Social Service programs.

I suggest we hold off on any more title changes until we see what the contents of articles look like and then get the correct titles (and capitalizations) to fit the content. Roger Lohmann 18:30, 30 September 2007 (CDT)

Well, I'll leave it to you Americans to decide what your social security is called:-) It is probably a mistake to think that the name of a law is also the name of something, albeit a common error. Anyway, I'll keep out of it! --Martin Baldwin-Edwards 18:42, 30 September 2007 (CDT)