Talk:Discourse on Method: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
imported>Larry Sanger
(demoting to 2, removing mathematics)
Line 2: Line 2:
|                abc = Discourse on Method
|                abc = Discourse on Method
|                cat1 = Philosophy  
|                cat1 = Philosophy  
|                cat2 = Mathematics
|                cat2 =  
|                cat3 =  
|                cat3 =  
|          cat_check = n
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 1
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 05:55, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 06:18, 2 August 2007 (CDT); [[User:Derek Harkness|Derek Harkness]] 05:55, 9 July 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}



Revision as of 05:18, 2 August 2007


Article Checklist for "Discourse on Method"
Workgroup category or categories Philosophy Workgroup [Categories OK]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? Yes
Checklist last edited by Larry Sanger 06:18, 2 August 2007 (CDT); Derek Harkness 05:55, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






Glad to see this new entry on Descartes' work -- but the diagram makes my eyes hurt a bit, and I'm not sure what it adds. Could it perhaps be downsized a bit, or placed a bit further down the page, or thumbnailed slightly? Also, perhaps this image should be added at the top? Russell Potter 09:35, 8 May 2007 (CDT)

I tried to make an overview of the method with a diagram. The original idea came from a "featured article" in the Portuguese wikipedia. For now, I shall move it down. I shall not be offended if you remove it. I may try something else later. Daniel Demaret 09:45, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
I took away the diagram for now. Daniel Demaret 14:16, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
The article looks good -- I don't think the diagram was a bad one, just a bit jarring as the first thing the reader sees; I thought it worked fine a little further down the page! I've taken the liberty of adding an image of the cover of the 1st edition Russell Potter 14:41, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
Hey, the new chart is much easier on the eyes; looks great! Russell Potter 09:43, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
Thank you for the positive feedback :) . Daniel Demaret 13:15, 10 May 2007 (CDT)
The chart is just a little bit wide for my screen. Can it be made just a little bit narrower? Derek Harkness 05:55, 9 July 2007 (CDT)

Mathematics, not really

The Discourse itself has little in the way of actual mathematics; it's pretty much pure philosophy. The treatises published with the Discourse were mathematical, but "the Discourse on Method" just refers to the methodological treatise. --Larry Sanger 07:46, 9 July 2007 (CDT)