Talk:K3 surface: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Aleksander Stos
m (Talk:K3 surfaces moved to Talk:K3 surface: singular form if possible)
imported>Subpagination Bot
m (Add {{subpages}} and remove checklist (details))
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{checklist
{{subpages}}
|                abc = K3 surfaces
 
|                cat1 = Mathematics
|                cat2 =
|                cat3 =
|          cat_check = n
|              status = 2
|        underlinked = y
|            cleanup = y
|                  by = --[[User:Aleksander Stos|AlekStos]] 16:20, 24 March 2007 (CDT)
}}
I think abelian surfaces have an equally good (if not better) claim to being 2-dimensional analogs of elliptic curves and would change the first sentence of the article to reflect that.
I think abelian surfaces have an equally good (if not better) claim to being 2-dimensional analogs of elliptic curves and would change the first sentence of the article to reflect that.
[[User:Holger Kley|Holger Kley]] 11:33, 8 July 2007 (CDT)
[[User:Holger Kley|Holger Kley]] 11:33, 8 July 2007 (CDT)

Latest revision as of 01:21, 4 November 2007

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition Complex or algebraic smooth minimal complete surface that is regular and has trivial canonical bundle. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Mathematics [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant British English

I think abelian surfaces have an equally good (if not better) claim to being 2-dimensional analogs of elliptic curves and would change the first sentence of the article to reflect that. Holger Kley 11:33, 8 July 2007 (CDT)