Talk:Canonical Gospels: Difference between revisions
imported>Peter Jackson No edit summary |
imported>Thomas Simmons |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
The stuff about the Council of Nicaea is just mediaeval legend. No up-to-date scholarly source repeats it. No ecumenical council defined a canon of scripture before the Council of Florence in 1439. The earliest source in which the standard canon of the NT appears is dated 367, & alternative canons continued to appear in diminishing numbers of sources for centuries. All this is stated in any respectable modern scholarly account. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 16:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | The stuff about the Council of Nicaea is just mediaeval legend. No up-to-date scholarly source repeats it. No ecumenical council defined a canon of scripture before the Council of Florence in 1439. The earliest source in which the standard canon of the NT appears is dated 367, & alternative canons continued to appear in diminishing numbers of sources for centuries. All this is stated in any respectable modern scholarly account. [[User:Peter Jackson|Peter Jackson]] 16:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
==Discuss so-called "legends" and reach consensus rather than arbitrarily dumping them== | |||
Let us discuss this sort of thing before it is deleted wholesale. It is not appropriate to simply label things legends and then arbitrarily delete them. So, if anyone insists on deleting again, this must first be taken up with an editor. I found the idea that Constantine had offered to buy the collection intriguing. I have never heard of that before, Is there a source for it?[[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] 02:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:00, 16 December 2008
Introduction
I posted a short introduction in three parts for the topic. Curiously, the actual events and particular history of the canonical scriptures is hard to find. Most sources I have read over the years start by assuming they are simply a given and provide very little discussion about process of selection. Interesting. Thomas Simmons 31 March, 2007 (EPT)
Vocabulary changes
Question: "conflated" was changed to 'merged" in
- The Gospels of Matthew and of Luke contain nativity stories, which are often conflated for popular commemoration.
- The Gospels of Matthew and of Luke contain nativity stories, which are often merged for popular commemoration.
Why? --Thomas Simmons 18:40, 28 April 2007 (CDT) +17 hours
I changed the headers to comply with current usage. --Thomas Simmons 20:28, 23 June 2007 (CDT)
Hey-- I just removed the mention of the Edict of Milan at the beginning of the Intro. I could not see how it was really relevant to the canonization of the gospels at Nicaea. (It's not as though Constantine and Licinius said: "Stop persecuting those Christians, with those four gospels of theirs!") It's certainly relevant to the topic of early Christianity, just not relevant to this article. Brian P. Long 16:34, 13 April 2008 (CDT)
The stuff about the Council of Nicaea is just mediaeval legend. No up-to-date scholarly source repeats it. No ecumenical council defined a canon of scripture before the Council of Florence in 1439. The earliest source in which the standard canon of the NT appears is dated 367, & alternative canons continued to appear in diminishing numbers of sources for centuries. All this is stated in any respectable modern scholarly account. Peter Jackson 16:59, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Discuss so-called "legends" and reach consensus rather than arbitrarily dumping them
Let us discuss this sort of thing before it is deleted wholesale. It is not appropriate to simply label things legends and then arbitrarily delete them. So, if anyone insists on deleting again, this must first be taken up with an editor. I found the idea that Constantine had offered to buy the collection intriguing. I have never heard of that before, Is there a source for it?Thomas Simmons 02:00, 17 December 2008 (UTC)