Talk:Canonical Gospels: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Larry Sanger
(Changing status to "2": not much beyond a stub, but still definitely beyond a stub)
imported>Thomas Simmons
(Rationale for Introduction)
Line 10: Line 10:
|                  by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 11:55, 14 March 2007 (CDT); [[User:Luke Brandt|luke]] 19:20, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
|                  by = [[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 11:55, 14 March 2007 (CDT); [[User:Luke Brandt|luke]] 19:20, 11 March 2007 (CDT)
}}
}}
=Introduction=
I posted a short introduction in three parts for the topic. Curiously, the actual events and particular history of the canonical scriptures is hard to find. Most sources I have read over the years start by assuming they are simply a given and provide very little discussion about process of selection. Interesting. [[User:Thomas Simmons|Thomas Simmons]] 31 March, 2007 (EPT)

Revision as of 20:45, 30 March 2007


Article Checklist for "Canonical Gospels"
Workgroup category or categories Religion Workgroup, History Workgroup [Editors asked to check categories]
Article status Developing article: beyond a stub, but incomplete
Underlinked article? Yes
Basic cleanup done? No
Checklist last edited by Larry Sanger 11:55, 14 March 2007 (CDT); luke 19:20, 11 March 2007 (CDT)

To learn how to fill out this checklist, please see CZ:The Article Checklist.






Introduction

I posted a short introduction in three parts for the topic. Curiously, the actual events and particular history of the canonical scriptures is hard to find. Most sources I have read over the years start by assuming they are simply a given and provide very little discussion about process of selection. Interesting. Thomas Simmons 31 March, 2007 (EPT)