Talk:History of philosophy of science: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Matthias Brendel
No edit summary
 
imported>Peter J. King
(merge with Philosophy of science?)
Line 1: Line 1:
This must be extended. Main lines can be taken form [[History of Philosophy]], and [[Philosophy of Science]]. --[[User:Matthias Brendel|Matthias Brendel]] 04:56, 11 December 2006 (CST)
This must be extended. Main lines can be taken form [[History of Philosophy]], and [[Philosophy of Science]]. --[[User:Matthias Brendel|Matthias Brendel]] 04:56, 11 December 2006 (CST)
Should this not be part of the [[Philosophy of science]] article?  The history of the subject and a description of the subject will overlap enormously I'd have thought. --[[User:Peter J. King|Peter J. King]] <span style="background:black">&nbsp;[[User talk:Peter J. King|<font color="yellow"><b>Talk</b></font>]]&nbsp;</span> 17:28, 8 April 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 16:28, 8 April 2007

This must be extended. Main lines can be taken form History of Philosophy, and Philosophy of Science. --Matthias Brendel 04:56, 11 December 2006 (CST)

Should this not be part of the Philosophy of science article? The history of the subject and a description of the subject will overlap enormously I'd have thought. --Peter J. King  Talk  17:28, 8 April 2007 (CDT)