Fear of radiation/Bibliography: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David MacQuigg No edit summary |
imported>David MacQuigg |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Data on the health effects of low-level radiation== | ==Data on the health effects of low-level radiation== | ||
* Chapter 5 "An Alternative to LNT" in [https://www.amazon.com/Why-Nuclear-Power-Been-Flop/dp/1098308964 Why Nuclear Power Has Been a Flop, Jack Devanney (2020)] | * Chapter 5 "An Alternative to LNT" in [https://www.amazon.com/Why-Nuclear-Power-Been-Flop/dp/1098308964 Why Nuclear Power Has Been a Flop, Jack Devanney (2020)] | ||
* Chapter 6 "Fear of radiation, cancer, health, ALARA, cost" in [https://electrifyingourworld.com/?page_id=834 Electrifying our World, Robert Hargraves (2021)] | * Chapter 6 "Fear of radiation, cancer, health, ALARA, cost" in [https://electrifyingourworld.com/?page_id=834 Electrifying our World, Robert Hargraves (2021)] a good summary of studies on the health effects of low-level radiation. | ||
* Sponsler, R. and Cameron, J.R. (2005) '[http://www.probeinternational.org/low-dose-NSWS-shipyard.pdf Nuclear shipyard worker study] (1980–1988): a large cohort exposed to low-dose-rate gamma radiation’, Int. J. Low Radiation, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.463–478. "The high-dose workers demonstrated significantly lower circulatory, respiratory, and all-cause mortality than did unexposed workers. Mortality from all cancers combined was also lower in the exposed cohort." | * Sponsler, R. and Cameron, J.R. (2005) '[http://www.probeinternational.org/low-dose-NSWS-shipyard.pdf Nuclear shipyard worker study] (1980–1988): a large cohort exposed to low-dose-rate gamma radiation’, Int. J. Low Radiation, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.463–478. "The high-dose workers demonstrated significantly lower circulatory, respiratory, and all-cause mortality than did unexposed workers. Mortality from all cancers combined was also lower in the exposed cohort." | ||
* Moss, D. (2013) [http://taiwan-apt-cancer-data-analysis.blogspot.com 'An Analysis of Cancer Incidence in Taiwan Apartment Residents Subjected to Low Dose Radiation'] interesting because this analysis of the data contradicts what the original authors concluded. | |||
* Evans, R.D. (1974) '[https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/Abstract/1974/11000/Radium_in_Man_.10.aspx Radium in Man]', Health Physics, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp.497-510. "At cumulative dosages below the order of 1000 skeletal average rads no clinically significant radiobiological injury has yet been observed in the M.I.T. series over a time span of 40–50 yr in more than 500 persons." | * Evans, R.D. (1974) '[https://journals.lww.com/health-physics/Abstract/1974/11000/Radium_in_Man_.10.aspx Radium in Man]', Health Physics, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp.497-510. "At cumulative dosages below the order of 1000 skeletal average rads no clinically significant radiobiological injury has yet been observed in the M.I.T. series over a time span of 40–50 yr in more than 500 persons." | ||
Revision as of 05:24, 30 December 2021
- Please sort and annotate in a user-friendly manner. For formatting, consider using automated reference wikification.
Data on the health effects of low-level radiation
- Chapter 5 "An Alternative to LNT" in Why Nuclear Power Has Been a Flop, Jack Devanney (2020)
- Chapter 6 "Fear of radiation, cancer, health, ALARA, cost" in Electrifying our World, Robert Hargraves (2021) a good summary of studies on the health effects of low-level radiation.
- Sponsler, R. and Cameron, J.R. (2005) 'Nuclear shipyard worker study (1980–1988): a large cohort exposed to low-dose-rate gamma radiation’, Int. J. Low Radiation, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp.463–478. "The high-dose workers demonstrated significantly lower circulatory, respiratory, and all-cause mortality than did unexposed workers. Mortality from all cancers combined was also lower in the exposed cohort."
- Moss, D. (2013) 'An Analysis of Cancer Incidence in Taiwan Apartment Residents Subjected to Low Dose Radiation' interesting because this analysis of the data contradicts what the original authors concluded.
- Evans, R.D. (1974) 'Radium in Man', Health Physics, Vol. 27, No. 5, pp.497-510. "At cumulative dosages below the order of 1000 skeletal average rads no clinically significant radiobiological injury has yet been observed in the M.I.T. series over a time span of 40–50 yr in more than 500 persons."