Talk:Failure (engineering): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:45, 30 July 2010

Citable Version ^[?]

To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.

Definition: Any occurrence of a designed system not performing as expected or desired. [d] [e]

Checklist and Archives

Workgroup category: Engineering [Editors asked to check categories]
Talk Archive: none	English language variant: American English

Unused subpages
Unused subpages: - Related Articles - Bibliography - External Links - Works - Discography - Filmography - Catalogs - Timelines - Gallery - Audio - Video - Code - Tutorials - Student Level - Signed Articles - Function - Addendum - Debate Guide - Advanced - Recipes - Citable Version

Good to see you've jumped straight in with a new article! I have set up the subpages and metadata for you. --Chris Key 21:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

You might want to look at discussions of managerial and cognitive failures in intelligence cycle management and cognitive traps for intelligence analysis.

If it's useful, I can get back to fault tolerance, especially for communications networks. Howard C. Berkowitz 23:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 ==Subpages created==
 Good to see you've jumped straight in with a new article! I have set up the subpages and metadata for you. --[[User:Chris Key|Chris Key]] 21:07, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
+==Nice start!==
+You might want to look at discussions of managerial and cognitive failures in [[intelligence cycle management]] and [[cognitive traps for intelligence analysis]].
+If it's useful, I can get back to [[fault tolerance]], especially for communications networks. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 23:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)