User talk:Donald C. Church: Difference between revisions
imported>Milton Beychok m (Welcome!) |
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz (→A personal welcome: new section) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
'''Welcome, new editor!''' We're very glad you've joined us. Here are pointers for a [[CZ:Quick Start|quick start]]. Also, when you get a chance, please read [[CZ:The Editor Role|The Editor Role]]. You can look at [[CZ:Getting Started|Getting Started]] for other helpful introductory pages. It is essential for you as an editor to join [https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-editors the Citizendium-Editors (broadcast) mailing list] in order to stay abreast of editor-related issues, as well as the [[CZ:Mailing lists|mailing list(s)]] that concern your particular interests. It is also important, for project-wide matters, to join [https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list]. You can test out [[CZ:How to edit an article|editing]] in the [[CZ:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the [http://forum.citizendium.org/ forums] is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any [[:Category:CZ Constables|constable]] for help, too. Me, for instance! Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and thank you! We appreciate your willingness to share your expertise, and we hope to see your edits on [[Special:Recentchanges|Recent changes]] soon. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 05:14, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | '''Welcome, new editor!''' We're very glad you've joined us. Here are pointers for a [[CZ:Quick Start|quick start]]. Also, when you get a chance, please read [[CZ:The Editor Role|The Editor Role]]. You can look at [[CZ:Getting Started|Getting Started]] for other helpful introductory pages. It is essential for you as an editor to join [https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-editors the Citizendium-Editors (broadcast) mailing list] in order to stay abreast of editor-related issues, as well as the [[CZ:Mailing lists|mailing list(s)]] that concern your particular interests. It is also important, for project-wide matters, to join [https://lists.purdue.edu/mailman/listinfo/citizendium-l the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list]. You can test out [[CZ:How to edit an article|editing]] in the [[CZ:Sandbox|sandbox]] if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the [http://forum.citizendium.org/ forums] is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any [[:Category:CZ Constables|constable]] for help, too. Me, for instance! Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and thank you! We appreciate your willingness to share your expertise, and we hope to see your edits on [[Special:Recentchanges|Recent changes]] soon. [[User:Milton Beychok|Milton Beychok]] 05:14, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
== A personal welcome == | |||
We seem to share a good deal of interests, and I even went to Towson High School for a year. Take a look at [[CZ: Emergency management workgroup]]; I'd be very open to collaboration in getting some of these to the Approvable level. | |||
For that matter, I need to write a paper for the Cape Cod Medical Reserve Corps/county government on disaster communications, but there's no reason that can't be something general here. I find that many local disaster comm plans focus on one or two media, and often miss the National Communications System GETS/WPS capabilities, or treat amateur radio (ARES) in a vacuum. Locally specific methods may be ignored -- here, for example, the first plans in a fishing area surrounded by water didn't consider marine radio. | |||
There's also much that can be done in the national security area, historic and present. | |||
We might want to look at the Gulf of Mexico oil spill incident, less to dissect it in detail and more as a case study in the NRF/NIMS. There is an article on the [[Stafford Act]], but it might be illustrative to show how other legislation can have disaster-specific implications, such as the Jones Act (actually, there are two). | |||
I'm an Editor for Politics, Engineering (the main place for emergency management), History, Military and Computers. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 17:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:00, 17 July 2010
Welcome!
Welcome, new editor! We're very glad you've joined us. Here are pointers for a quick start. Also, when you get a chance, please read The Editor Role. You can look at Getting Started for other helpful introductory pages. It is essential for you as an editor to join the Citizendium-Editors (broadcast) mailing list in order to stay abreast of editor-related issues, as well as the mailing list(s) that concern your particular interests. It is also important, for project-wide matters, to join the Citizendium-L (broadcast) mailing list. You can test out editing in the sandbox if you'd like. If you need help to get going, the forums is one option. That's also where we discuss policy and proposals. You can ask any constable for help, too. Me, for instance! Just put a note on their "talk" page. Again, welcome and thank you! We appreciate your willingness to share your expertise, and we hope to see your edits on Recent changes soon. Milton Beychok 05:14, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
A personal welcome
We seem to share a good deal of interests, and I even went to Towson High School for a year. Take a look at CZ: Emergency management workgroup; I'd be very open to collaboration in getting some of these to the Approvable level.
For that matter, I need to write a paper for the Cape Cod Medical Reserve Corps/county government on disaster communications, but there's no reason that can't be something general here. I find that many local disaster comm plans focus on one or two media, and often miss the National Communications System GETS/WPS capabilities, or treat amateur radio (ARES) in a vacuum. Locally specific methods may be ignored -- here, for example, the first plans in a fishing area surrounded by water didn't consider marine radio.
There's also much that can be done in the national security area, historic and present.
We might want to look at the Gulf of Mexico oil spill incident, less to dissect it in detail and more as a case study in the NRF/NIMS. There is an article on the Stafford Act, but it might be illustrative to show how other legislation can have disaster-specific implications, such as the Jones Act (actually, there are two).
I'm an Editor for Politics, Engineering (the main place for emergency management), History, Military and Computers. Howard C. Berkowitz 17:00, 17 July 2010 (UTC)