CZ Talk:History Workgroup/Style Guide: Difference between revisions
imported>Russell D. Jones |
imported>Russell D. Jones |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
If you'll look at [[Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain/Bibliography]], do you think the the Radcliffe entry should belongs there. The way you've described "works" comes closest, except this is a pointer to an collection of manuscripts from the family. I still think we are being too nuanced among bibliography, external links, works, etc. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | If you'll look at [[Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain/Bibliography]], do you think the the Radcliffe entry should belongs there. The way you've described "works" comes closest, except this is a pointer to an collection of manuscripts from the family. I still think we are being too nuanced among bibliography, external links, works, etc. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 22:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:My advice is that it's probably a good idea to note where his papers can be found, so keep it. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] | :My advice is that it's probably a good idea to note where his papers can be found, so keep it. I've added a line about archives to the style guide. [[User:Russell D. Jones|Russell D. Jones]] |
Revision as of 19:05, 16 June 2010
Probably should move some of the discussion here
Come the revolution, or whatever, and there's an active Editorial Council, we can look for general solutions. I don't disagree, Russell, that you've defined a use for Debate Guide, but, if you hadn't explained it, I wouldn't have thought of that application. Instead, I would have assumed it was a guide for educators assigning debates, which may or may not be a likely CZ audience given the Charter draft assumptions about audience. With Larry's K-12 interests, I suspect some of the subpages are meant to serve that audience.
If you'll look at Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain/Bibliography, do you think the the Radcliffe entry should belongs there. The way you've described "works" comes closest, except this is a pointer to an collection of manuscripts from the family. I still think we are being too nuanced among bibliography, external links, works, etc. Howard C. Berkowitz 22:58, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
- My advice is that it's probably a good idea to note where his papers can be found, so keep it. I've added a line about archives to the style guide. Russell D. Jones