Great Recession/Addendum: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
imported>Nick Gardner
Line 324: Line 324:
|}
|}


The recession had widely differing impacts upon the economies of members of the eurozone  but all were subject to the [[monetary policy]] of the [[European Central Bank]]. In 2008/2009, the bank responded to the recession by reducing its [[discount rate]] in stages to a minimum of 1 per cent, and adopting a limited  amount of [[quantitative easing]], a policy that resulted in an increase in the [[monetary base]] of approximately 50 per cent over its pre-crisis level by the end of 2009<ref name=base/>.  The recession ended  the third quarter of 2009 with a modest (0.3% quarter-on-quarter)
As reported below, the recession had widely differing impacts upon the economies of members of the [[eurozone]] but all were subject to the [[monetary policy]] of the [[European Central Bank]]. In 2008/2009, the bank responded to the recession by reducing its [[discount rate]] in stages to a minimum of 1 per cent, and adopting a limited  amount of [[quantitative easing]], a policy that resulted in an increase in the [[monetary base]] of approximately 50 per cent over its pre-crisis level by the end of 2009<ref name=base/>.  The recession ended in the third quarter of 2009 with a modest (0.3% quarter-on-quarter) increase in real GDP, and continued throughout 2010 and 2011.  
(increase in real GDP and continued throughout 2010 and 2011.  


With the return of economic growth, attention turned to [[fiscal policy]]. The EU's [[growth and stability pact]] required member governments to limit  their [[budget deficit]]s to  3 per cent of GDP and  their [[public debt]] to 60 per cent of GDP, but there had been numerous breaches.   
With the return of economic growth, attention turned to [[fiscal policy]]. The EU's [[growth and stability pact]] required member governments to limit  their [[budget deficit]]s to  3 per cent of GDP and  their [[public debt]] to 60 per cent of GDP, but there had been numerous breaches.   
Line 377: Line 376:
| align="center"| 3½
| align="center"| 3½
|}
|}
Few member governments were in compliance with those limits by the end of  2009 <ref>[http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/10/288 ''Commission assesses stability and convergence programmes of fourteen EU Member States'', European Commission, 17 March 2010]]</ref>.
Few member governments were in compliance with those limits by the end of  2009 <ref>[http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/10/288 ''Commission assesses stability and convergence programmes of fourteen EU Member States'', European Commission, 17 March 2010]]</ref>. Twelve member states had [[public debt]] ratios higher than 60% of GDP in 2009, including  France (77.6%) and Germany.(60.9%)<ref>[http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/2-22042010-BP/EN/2-22042010-BP-EN.PDF ''Provision of deficit and debt data for 2009 - first notification, Eurostat April 2010]</ref>. There was general agreement that priority should be given to the achievement of a rapid return to compliance with the agreed limits, and programmes of reductions in [[public expenditure]] and increases of taxation were put in hand. Concern nevertheless developed among bond market investors  concerning the [[fiscal sustainability]] of  some eurozone  members.
Twelve member states had public debt ratios higher than 60% of GDP in 2009, including  France (77.6%) and Germany.(60.9%)<ref>[http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/2-22042010-BP/EN/2-22042010-BP-EN.PDF ''Provision of deficit and debt data for 2009 - first notification, Eurostat April 2010]</ref>.
It became evident in early 2010 that, without external assistance, the Greek government would be forced to [[default (finance)|default]] on its debt, and in the course of 2010, investors' fears of [[sovereign default]]  by other eurozone governments increased their cost of borrowing. Conditional loans to the governments of Greece, Ireland and Portugal, that were intended to give them time to bring about a return to fiscal sustainability, failed to reassure investors. In the latter half of 2011 it  became evident that a default by the Greek government could no longer be avoided, and there were increases in the [[sovereign spread]]s of Spain and Italy that were attributed to contagion from Greece. In mid November there were increases in the bond yields of other eurozone countries including France, and on 24 November 2011 there was a partial failure of a German government bond auction.  
 
Particular concern developed in early 2010 concerning the [[fiscal sustainability]] of the economies of the "PIIGS" countries ([[Great Recession/Addendum#Portugal|Portugal]], [[Great Recession/Addendum#Ireland|Ireland]], [[Great Recession/Addendum#Italy|Italy]], [[Great Recession/Addendum#Greece|Greece]] and [[Great Recession/Addendum#Spain|Spain]]) following rating downgrades by the [[credit rating agency|credit rating agencies]]. It became evident  that, without external assistance, the Greek government would be forced to [[default (finance)|default]] on its debt, and in the course of 2010, investors' fears of [[sovereign default]]  by other eurozone governments increased their cost of borrowing. In the latter half of 20ll, it  became evident that a default by the Greek government could no longer be avoided.  There were increases in the [[sovereign spread]]s of Spain and Italy that were attributed to contagion from Greece. In mid November there were increases in the bond yields of other eurozone countries including France, and on 24 November 2011 there was a partial failure of a German government bond auction.  


The World Bank's January 2012 forecast shows a GDP growth rate of 0.3 per cent for 2012 [[Global stagnation/Addendum#Growth rates|(table)]].
The World Bank's January 2012 forecast shows a GDP growth rate of 0.3 per cent for 2012 [[Global stagnation/Addendum#Growth rates|(table)]].

Revision as of 05:34, 19 January 2012

This article is developed but not approved.
 Main Article
 Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Timelines [?]
Addendum [?]
 
https://en.citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Great_Recession/Addendum&printable=yes
This addendum is a continuation of the article Great Recession.


International recession and recovery by region

The World

GDP growth (%)([1])
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
5.2 1.7 -2.2 3.8 3.2
Trade growth (vol%) ([1])
2007 2008  2009  2010 2011
7.2 3.2 -11.0 11.5 8.0

The financial crisis had an adverse effect upon most of the world's economies. Those worst affected include the high income countries (The United States, Canada, Europe and Japan) with a collective GDP reduction in 2009 of 3.3 per cent. Output reductions between the peak in 2008 and the trough in 2009 were approximately 4 per cent of GDP in the United States, 6 percent in the United Kingdom, 6½ per cent in Italy, 7 per cent in Germany and 8½ per cent in Japan[2]. Next in severity were the downturns of the developing economies (excluding China and India) with a collective GDP reduction of 2.2 per cent[1] The recession had little effect on the South Asian economies, and a comparatively small effect on the East Asian economies. Its impact on the economies of China and India took the form only of significant growth rate reductions.

The advanced G20 countries entered the recession in 2007 with a public debt averaging 78 per cent of GDP (United Kingdom 44 per cent, United States 62, Germany 63, France 64, Italy 104, Japan 188), which is projected to rise to 118 per cent by 2014 (Germany 89 per cent , France 96, United Kingdom 98, United States 108, Italy 129, Japan 246 )[3]

Economic growth returned to most countries in the course of 2009 at or above pre-recession levels in most developing countries, but below pre-recession rates in many industrialised countries.

America

The United States

2009 2010 2011
2008 2009 2010   Q1      Q2     Q3     Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous quarter at an annual rate) [4] 0.0 -2.7 2.9 -6.7 -0.7 1.7 3.8 3.9 3.8 2.3 2.3 0.4 1.3 1.8
Unemployment (% of labour force)[5] 5.8 9.3 9.6 8.2 9.3 9.7 10.0 9.7 9.6 9.7 9.6 8.9 9.1 9.1 8.7
Consumer prices (% increase on the same period of the previous year)[6] 3.8 -0.4 1.6 0.2 -1.3 -1.6 1.4 2.4 1.8 1.2 1.3 2.1 3.4 3.8 3.4

The growth rate of American economy slowed sharply from around 3 per cent in 2006 to 2 per cent in 2007 and the economy continued to operate at below its trend rate of growth until the fourth quarter of 2009. Following the bursting of the house price bubble and the development of the subprime mortgage crisis in 2007, two and a half million families faced foreclosure in 2008, and the reductions in personal wealth resulting from the fall in house prices were causing further reductions in demand. The financial crash of 2008, and the resulting credit crunch, caused further declines in business activity, which added more pressure on the financial system and three and a half million Americans lost their jobs in the course of 2008[7]. Credit remained tight in 2009 with lenders imposing strict standards for all types of loans [8] and unemployment continued to rise throughout the year. By the second quarter of 2011 real gdp per person was 4 percent below its level in the 4th quarter of 2007 and 10 per cent below its 1997-2007 trend line[9]

The Federal Reserve Bank introduced a range of emergency measures, including discount rate reductions and credit easing that resulted in an increase in the monetary base of approximately 140 per cent over its pre-crisis level by the end of 2009 [10], and the government introduced a fiscal stimulus package that is estimated to total 4.8 per cent of GDP [11]. The Federal budget deficit rose sharply under the operation of the economy's automatic stabilisers, and by 2010 the public debt had risen from its 2007 level of 62 percent of GDP to over 90 per cent[3] which is projected to rise to 108 percent by 2014[3]. The country's total debt in 2008 was 290 per cent of GDP (made up of government debt 60 per cent, household debt 78 per cent and business debt 152 per cent) [12]. On August 10 2010, after a contentious debate, the Federal Reserve Board decided to maintain its $2.05 trillion stock of mortgage debt and U.S. Treasury holdings, in view of fears of a second downturn[13].

On August 1 2011 the Congress agreed to raise the federal debt ceiling by up to $2.4tn and make budget savings worth a similar amount over 10 years[14].

The Congressional Budget Office estimate that effect of a broadly similar "illustrative policy" would be to decrease output in 2012, 2013, and 2014 by amounts ranging from roughly 0.1 percent to 0.6 percent. Beyond 2014, the policy would lead to gains in GNP amounting the years from 2019 through 2021, by roughly 0.5 percent to 1.4 percent[15]. An IMF comment took the view that "the planned spending cuts are appropriately phased and not overly frontloaded so as not to undermine growth"[16].

The World Bank's January 2012 forecast shows a GDP growth rate of 2.2 per cent for 2012 (table).


RETURN TO TOP

Canada

2009 2010
2008 2009 2010 2011   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[17] 0.5 -2.6 3.2 2.9 -1.8 -0.7 0.2 1.2 1.4 0.5 1.2
Unemployment (% of labour force)[18] 6.1 8.3 7.8 8.4 8.5 8.9 8.2 8.0 8.0
Consumer prices (% increase on the same period of the previous year)[6] 2.4 0.3 1.4 0.1 -0.8 1.0 0.4 0.3 -0.1 0.1

The Canadian mortgage market did not experience the surge in defaults that triggered the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States, and the subsequent financial crash of 2008 had little effect upon the Canadian financial system. Events in the United States nevertheless affected the rest of the Canadian economy. The economic growth rate faltered in the Autumn of 2007 as exports fell in response to falling demand from the United States, and the downturn developed into a sharp contraction, led by falling investment and household spending, in the last quarter of 2008. The government introduced fiscal stimulus measures amounting to 4 per cent of GDP spread over the three years 2008-10, and a modest recovery started in the second half of 2009. By the second quarter of 2011 real gdp per person was 1 percent below its level in the 4th quarter of 2007 and 9 per cent below its 1997-2007 trend line[9].

Central and Southern America

GDP growth (%)[1]
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Mexico 3.3 1.4 -6.1 5.5 4.4
Brazil 5.7 5.1 -0.7 7.5 4.2
Argentina 8.7 6.8 0.9 9.2 6.3

The Mexican economy suffered from a sharp fall in Mexican workers' remittances from abroad[19] and from the fall in the price of oil. In Brazil, GDP fell by 0.2 percent year-on-year in the first two quarters of the crisis period, but rebounded in the second and third quarter of 2009. In Argentina, GDP increased by 0.5 and 0.2 percent on an annualized basis in the second and third quarters of 2009[20].





RETURN TO TOP

Europe

The European Union

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
GDP growth(%)[21] 3.2 0.3 -4.2 2.0 1.6
Unemployment rate (%))[21] 7.2 7.1 9.0 9.7 9.7
Consumer price change (%))[21] 2.4 3.7 1.0 2.1 3.0

The European economy emerged from a deep recession during 2009 and most national economies have since experienced continuous below-trend growth. However the Polish economy escaped the recession, the Greek economy has remained in recession, the Portuguese economy has suffered a downturn, and the economies of Latvia, Romania, Bulgaria and Ireland are experiencing no more than a hesitant recovery. Unemployment rates in mid-2011 ranged from 4 to 5 per cent in the Netherlands and Austria to over 20 per cent in Spain and the Baltic States.

The Eurozone

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
GDP (% change on previous year)[21] 3.0 0.4 -4.2 1.9 1.5
Unemployment (% of labour force)[21] 7.6 7.6 9.5 10.1 10.0
HICP consumer price index (% change on previous year)[21] 2.1 3.3 0.3 1.6 2.6

As reported below, the recession had widely differing impacts upon the economies of members of the eurozone but all were subject to the monetary policy of the European Central Bank. In 2008/2009, the bank responded to the recession by reducing its discount rate in stages to a minimum of 1 per cent, and adopting a limited amount of quantitative easing, a policy that resulted in an increase in the monetary base of approximately 50 per cent over its pre-crisis level by the end of 2009[10]. The recession ended in the third quarter of 2009 with a modest (0.3% quarter-on-quarter) increase in real GDP, and continued throughout 2010 and 2011.

With the return of economic growth, attention turned to fiscal policy. The EU's growth and stability pact required member governments to limit their budget deficits to 3 per cent of GDP and their public debt to 60 per cent of GDP, but there had been numerous breaches.

PIIGS debt (% of GDP)
Portugal    Italy     Ireland   Greece   Spain  
End 2009[11] 77 116 64 115 53
End 2010[12] 93 119 96 143 60
10 year Sovereign spread over German bonds, per cent
Portugal    Italy     Ireland   Greece   Spain  
Q1 2010 ½ ½ 1½ 3½ ½
Q3 2011 8 3½ 8 12 3½

Few member governments were in compliance with those limits by the end of 2009 [22]. Twelve member states had public debt ratios higher than 60% of GDP in 2009, including France (77.6%) and Germany.(60.9%)[23]. There was general agreement that priority should be given to the achievement of a rapid return to compliance with the agreed limits, and programmes of reductions in public expenditure and increases of taxation were put in hand. Concern nevertheless developed among bond market investors concerning the fiscal sustainability of some eurozone members. It became evident in early 2010 that, without external assistance, the Greek government would be forced to default on its debt, and in the course of 2010, investors' fears of sovereign default by other eurozone governments increased their cost of borrowing. Conditional loans to the governments of Greece, Ireland and Portugal, that were intended to give them time to bring about a return to fiscal sustainability, failed to reassure investors. In the latter half of 2011 it became evident that a default by the Greek government could no longer be avoided, and there were increases in the sovereign spreads of Spain and Italy that were attributed to contagion from Greece. In mid November there were increases in the bond yields of other eurozone countries including France, and on 24 November 2011 there was a partial failure of a German government bond auction.

The World Bank's January 2012 forecast shows a GDP growth rate of 0.3 per cent for 2012 (table).

RETURN TO TOP

The United Kingdom

2010 2011
2008 2009 2010 2011   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[17][24] -0.1 -4.9 1.3 1.5 0.4 1.2 0.8 -0.5 0.5 0.2 0.5
Unemployment (% of labour force)[25][24] 5.6 7.6 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.8 7.9 7.7 7.9
Consumer prices (% increase on the same period of the previous year)[6][24] 3.6 2.2 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.3 3.3
Savings ratio 1.4 6.3 6.0 3.5 5.0

The rapid growth of the British economy in the early years of the 21st century had been partly due to the success of its comparatively large financial sector[26] and to the development of a comparatively vigorous housing boom[27], and those factors had a strong influence upon the impact of the recession that followed the collapse of the Lehman Brothers bank in the United States. Even before that collapse, some of its banks had been forced to make large writedowns because of their involvement in the subprime mortgages crisis and there had been a run on one of them [28], but the banking panic that followed the fall of Lehman Brothers, threatened the continued existence of the financial system. In October 2008 the British Government announced a £500 billion rescue scheme [29], including powers to take equity stakes in ailing banks and an undertaking to guarantee interbank loans. An impending collapse of the UK's financial system was averted, but the surviving banks adopted a policy of deleveraging that resulted in a severe credit crunch followed by a general economic downturn. In the second half of 2008 gdp fell by 2.2 per cent with falls in financial sector output and in housing and commercial investment. By the second quarter of 2011 real gdp per person was 6 percent below its level in the 4th quarter of 2007 and 13 per cent below its 1997-2007 trend line[9].

The Bank of England introduced a range of emergency measures including discount rate reductions and quantitative easing that resulted in an increase in the monetary base of approximately 230 per cent over its pre-crisis level by the end of 2009 [10] A fiscal stimulus amounting to 1.5 per cent of GDP was introduced by the November Pre-Budget Report, including a temporary 2.5 percentage point reduction in value-added tax and a bringing forward of £3 billion of capital investment.

In 2008, the country's total debt was 469 per cent of GDP (made up of government debt 52 per cent, household debt 114 per cent and business debt 303 per cent)[12]. The possibility of household deleveraging was considered in 2010 to present a danger of hampering recovery[30] from the recession.

The United Kingdom entered the recession in 2007 with a public debt of 44 per cent of its GDP, which had risen to 62 per cent by 2010, about 30 per cent of which was held by overseas investors. In February 2010 its Parliament passed the Fiscal Responsibility Act[31] which imposed a duty on the Treasury to ensure that by the financial year ending 2014 public sector net borrowing as a percentage of GDP is at least halved from its level for the financial year ending 2010, and the budget of June 2010 introduced proposals that were expected to achieve that halving two years sooner[32]. While approving the revised programme, an IMF team commented in July 2011 that "there are significant risks to inflation, growth, and unemployment", and recommended a flexible response to shocks, including a "significant loosening of macroeconomic policies" should there be evidence of impending stagnation[33].

RETURN TO TOP

Germany

2010 2011
2008 2009 2010 2011   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[21] 1.1 -5.1 3.7 2.9 0.6 2.3 0.7 0.0 1.4 0.1 0.5 0.0
Unemployment (% of labour force)[21][25] 7.5 7.8 7.1 6.1 7.3 7.0 6.7 6.7 6.3 6.0 5.8
Consumer prices (% increase on the same period of the previous year)[6][24] 2.8 0.2 1.1 0.8 1.1 1.2 1.6 2.2 2.4

The international banking panic had an immediate impact on Germany's fragmented banking system and in October 2008 the government set up a fund to guarantee the banks' debts and provide for recapitalisation and asset purchases. Although there had been falls in national output earlier in the year, the government did not at first consider further action to be necessary, but by the end of the year a fall in exports signalled the onset of major downturn. By the second quarter of 2011 real gdp per person was 2 percent above its level in the 4th quarter of 2007 but 3 per cent below its 1997-2007 trend line[9].


The government introduced a fiscal stimulus package that is estimated to total 3.4 per cent of GDP[11] that included reductions in income, and payroll taxes(starting in July) as well as industrial subsidies and infrastructure investments. Those discretionary actions together with the action of the automatic stabilisers were expected to increase the budget deficit to 7% of GDP and raise the national debt from its 2007 level of 65 per cent of GDP to over 80 per cent by 2010[3]. The recovery in the second half of 2009 has been attributed by the OECD to the fiscal stimulus, expansionary monetary conditions, an upswing in world trade and restocking activities of companies[34] but in view of the substantial output gap that remained at the end of 2009 they estimate that the pre-crisis level of production will not be reached until 2013.

Germany entered the recession in 2007 with a national debt of 63 per cent of its GDP which is projected to rise to 101 percent by 2014[3]. In 2008, the country's total debt was 274 per cent of GDP (made up of government debt 69 per cent, household debt 66 per cent and business debt 138 per cent)[12]

RETURN TO TOP

France

2010 2011
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[21] 2.3 -0.1 -2.7 1.5 1.6 0.2 0.7 0.4 0.6 0.9 0.0 0.2 -0.1
Unemployment (% of labour force)[21] 8.4 7.8 9.5 9.8 9.8 9.9 9.9 9.7 9.8 9.7 9.6
Consumer prices (% increase on the same period of the previous year)[6][24] 3.2 0.7 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.6 1.5 1.8 1.8 2.2

The French economy suffered less from the recession than those of most of the other G7 countries. French banks were affected less than their counterparts in many other countries, primarily because they had diversified their activities and adopted more ,defensive prudential lending standards, and household indebtedness remained lower than in other countries. The measures taken by the government in October 2008 to boost the liquidity and solvency of the big banks were successsful in maintainng the functioning of the credit market [35]. By the second quarter of 2011 real gdp per person was 2 percent below its level in the 4th quarter of 2007 and 8 per cent below its 1997-2007 trend line[9].


The government introduced a fiscal stimulus package that is estimated to total 1.3 per cent of GDP [11] including infrastructure spending, measures to relieve cash-flow difficulties for small and medium-sized enterprises, tax holidays for low-income households, increased unemployment compensation, and loans to the car and aircraft industries.

France entered the recession in 2007 with a national debt of 64 per cent of its GDP which is projected to rise to 96 percent by 2014[3]. In 2008, the country's total debt was 308 per cent of GDP (made up of government debt 73 per cent, household debt 110 per cent and business debt 125 per cent)[12]

RETURN TO TOP

Italy

2010 2011
2008 2009 2010 2011   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[21] -1.2 -5.1 1.5 0.5 0.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 -0.2
Unemployment (% of labour force)[21] 6.7 7.8 8.4 8.1 8.4 8.5 8.2 8.3 8.1 8.0
Consumer prices (% increase on the same period of the previous year)[6][24] 3.5 0.8 1.4 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.9 2.1 3.0

Italian banks were less exposed to high-risk products than those of other large countries because of their conservative behaviour and their regulators' and supervisory caution, and there were no bank closures or rescues. [36]. The economy nevertheless suffered a relatively severe recession. By the second quarter of 2011 real gdp per person was 6 percent below its level in the 4th quarter of 2007 and 9 per cent below its 1997-2007 trend line[9].

Italy entered the recession in 2007 with a national debt of 104 per cent of its GDP which is projected to rise to 129 percent by 2014[3]. In 2008, the country's total debt was 298 per cent of GDP (made up of government debt 117 per cent, household debt 81 per cent and business debt 303 per cent)[12]

A spread of Italian government bonds over German government bonds developed in the course of 2010 and rose to over 3½ per cent by August 2011.


RETURN TO TOP

Iceland

2009 2010
2007 2008 2009   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[17] 5.6 1.7 -7.0 -0.6 -2.7 -5.4 -0.3 -1,2 -3.1 1.2 -1.6
Unemployment (% of labour force)[18] 2.3 3.0 7.2 7.2 6.9 7.3 7.7 7.3 6.8
Consumer prices (percent increase on the same period of the previous year) 5.1 12.7 17.1 11.9 11.1 8.6 7.4 7.1 4.4 2.8

Before the Lehman Brothers collapse in September 2008, Iceland had a thriving economy, its government had a budgetary surplus, its banks had no toxic assets and its consumers had not indulged in any speculative bubbles. (Although Willem Buiter and Anne SIbert [37], believed that its banking model was not viable). A few months later its banking system had collapsed[38], its government was deeply in debt, its currency had suffered a 65 per cent depreciation, real earnings had fallen by 18 per cent, and its economy was facing a deep and prolonged recession[39]. Those were the consequences of the impact of the international credit crunch on a banking system that had overseas debts amounting to almost ten times the country's GDP. Unable to roll over their debts, three of its largest banks had to be rescued by the government, and the consequent rise in national debt caused a flight from the national currency that made matters worse. In October 2009 an OECD economist reported that Iceland's economy was in the midst of a deep recession; the exchange rate had plunged; capital flows had been frozen; inflation was up; public debt had risen; social needs had increased; and that the unemployment insurance fund was been nearly depleted[40]. In November 2009 the Moodys credit rating agency downgraded Iceland's government bonds to its lowest investment grade. The government had introduced fiscal stimulus measures amounting to 9.4 per cent of GDP spread over the two years 2009-10, a loan was obtained from the International Monetary Fund and recovery was expected during 2011 [41].

In a June 2010 press release, the IMF effectively approved the Government's fiscal policy with the statement that "the planned 3 percent of GDP fiscal adjustment can deliver a primary surplus and a reduction in Iceland’s public debt, provided budget implementation stays on track in 2010"[42].

RETURN TO TOP

Ireland

2010 2011
2008 2009 2010 2011   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[21] -3.0 -7.0 -0.4 1.1 2.2 -1.2 0.5 -1.4 1.9 1.6
Unemployment (% of labour force)[21] 6.3 11.9 13.7 14.4 12.8 13.1 13.7 14.4 14.3 14.1
Consumer prices (percent increase on the same period of the previous year)[24] 3.1 1.7 -1.5 -3.4 -1.4 0.2 -0.8 0.9 1.2

A downturn in the output of the formerly booming Irish construction industry that started in 2007, intensified and developed into a full-blown economic recession in the course of 2008 and construction and property companies began to default on loans from the banks. News of their defaults made foreign banks and investors, that had been the banks' principal source of short-term finance, reluctant to risk further commitments, and a banking crisis developed. Consumer confidence fell and there was a very sharp increase in unemployment[43][44]. In an attempt to restore confidence, the Irish government undertook to guarantee loans to the banks. GDP growth rates averaging about 6 percent over the period 1995-2007 were followed by year-on-year falls of 8 percent in the 4th quarter of 2008 and 9 per cent in the first quarter of 2009, and the inflation rate fell to -3 per cent in September 2009. By the 2nd quarter of 2010, GDP per person was 12 per cent below its level in the 4th quarter or 2007[45]

The government introduced fiscal stimulus measures amounting to 4.4 per cent of GDP spread over the three years 2008-10 which, combined with the effects of its automatic stabilisers is expected to raise the national debt to over 80 per cent of GDP from its 2007 level of 28 per cent[3]. Foreign investors became wary of the possibility a sovereign default, and the government's ability to finance the deficit was threatened by a general loss of confidence. In March 2009 the Standard and Poor credit rating agency downgraded its rating for Ireland from AAA to AA+[46], and April, the government decided that the only way to restore confidence was to take steps to reduce its deficit - and took the extraordinary step of increasing taxation in the midst of a recession [47]. Additional steps taken included direct purchase of stock in some banks and the establishment of the "National Asset Management Agency" - essentially a government-owned bank that will buy toxic debt from six financial institutions - both steps aimed at improving their balance sheets and freeing up capital.[48][49].

The report of an IMF consultation published in July 2010 concluded that the governments "aggressive measures" had helped gain policy credibility and stabilize the economy but that further long-haul efforts with active risk management would be need to preserve policy credibility[50]. On August 24, 2010 the Standard and Poor's credit rating agency downgraded Ireland's debt for the 3rd time to AA- (following 3 downgrades by the Fitch agency and 2 by Moody's).

Ireland's economy suffered a second downturn in the second quarter of 2010 and the Government's financial position continued to deteriorate. In September 2010, its CDS spread reached a record 5 per cent. On the 22nd of November 2010 the government applied for financial assistance from the EU and the IMF[51] and on the 28th of Nonember, the Government announced the terms of the loan[52].

The National Recovery Plan of December 2010 aimed to consolidate public finances by 3.8% of GDP in 2011. Income tax bands werw to fall by 10%, and there were to be reductions in both current and capital expenditure.

The spread of Irish government bonds over German bonds had reached 8 percent by August 2011.

RETURN TO TOP

Russia

GDP growth (%)[1]
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
8.1 5.6 -7.8 4.0 4.4

A fall in the oil price combined with the collapse in world trade and a withdrawal of international credit had a devastating effect upon the Russian economy in the first half of 2009, and its GDP fell by about 10 percent [53]. That prompted the central bank to inject large amounts of liquidity into the banking sector and to permit a gradual depreciation of the rouble by about 25 per cent against the dollar-euro basket. The Government launched a major fiscal stimulus in April 2009, consisting mainly of social transfer payments[13]. The budget balance changed from a surplus of 4¼ per cent of GDP in 2008 to a deficit of 6¼ per cent in 2009 which the Government monetised from reserves, leaving its public debt at the internationally low level of 11 per cent of GDP [54][55].

Russia's recession ended in the first quarter of 2010 with a GDP growth at a yearly rate of 3.3 per cent, followed in the second quarter by growth at a yearly rate of 5.2 per cent. By the 2nd quarter of 2011, real gdp per person was 2 percent above its level in the 4th quarter of 2007[45]

RETURN TO TOP

The Baltic States

GDP growth (%)
2007 2008  2009  2010e
Estonia 7.2 -3.6 -14.7 -1.5
Lithuania 9.8 2.8 -14.8 3.3
Latvia 10.0 -4.6 -18.0 -4.0


The fastest-growing economies in the European Union in 2006 became its three fastest-contracting economies in 2009. Years of boom were followed by falls in GDP averaging about 1½ per cent in 2008 and about 16 per cent in 2009. An International Monetary Fund report on Estonia noted that investment already started to slow in mid-2007, along with a bursting of the property bubble, when the two main banks tightened lending conditions. The collapse of global external financing and foreign trade in the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy aftermath exacerbated the downturn. Deflation and wage declines were projected to persist through 2010 [56], but growth rates are expected to average between 2 and 5 per cent over the period 2010-14[57] [58].

RETURN TO TOP

Greece

2010 2011
2008 2009 2010 2011   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[21] -0.2 -3.2 -3.5 -5.5 -0.6 -1.7 -1.6 -2.1 0.2 -2.7 -0.7 -0.7
Unemployment (% of labour force)[21] 7.7 9.5 12.5 16.6 10.2 11.0 12.9 14.1 15.0
Consumer prices (% change on the same period of the preceding year)[24] 4.2 1.3 4.6 3.0 5.2 4.8 4.2 3.1

When Greece joined the Eurozone in 2001, it was less prosperous than the other members[59], but its GDP grew more rapidly over the next seven years and fell less rapidly in the course of 2009. By the end of 2009, its unemployment rate had nevertheless risen in line with the European average and it was still suffering higher levels of poverty [60]. The economy remained in recession throughout 2010, and by the 2nd quarter of 2011, real gdp per person was 10 percent below its level in the 4th quarter of 2007[45]

By the end of 2009, Greece's national debt had risen by about 25 per cent above its pre-crisis level of 100 per cent of GDP[3]. Concern about the sustainability of the goverment's fiscal policy had led the credit rating agencies to downgrade the government's debt in January 2010, [61], and several times after that; and by early 2010 the cost of insuring against default by the Greek government rose after Moody’s Investors Service said the country’s economy was facing a “slow death” from deteriorating finances[62]. The investor panic continued until, in April 2010, it was announced that the IMF and the Eurozone were prepared to offer the government loans amounting in total to €110 billion over three years. [63] [64][65]. In return, the Government was required to carry out a programme of fiscal contraction that was expected to drive its economy into a deep recession. The loan failed to reassure investors, and the CDS spread on Greek bonds rose from 4.8 per cent in April to 10 pre cent in November. In July 2011, Eurozone leaders and the International Monetary Fund agreed to lend Greece a further 109bn euros ($155bn, £96.3bn)[66] Under the deal, private sector investors - that is, the banks and institutions that hold Greek bonds - are being asked to accept a 21% loss on the debt they hold.

Spain

2010 2011
2008 2009 2010 2011   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[21] 0.9 -3.7 -0.1 0.7 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.0 -0.1
Unemployment (% of labour force)[21] 11.3 18.0 20.1 20.9 19.4 20.1 20.5 20.5 20.6 20.8
Consumer prices (% increase on the same period of the previous year)[24] 4.1 -0.2 1.7 1.1 1.6 2.0 2.3 3.4 3.4

The recession in Spain was shallower but more protracted than the European average, and the recovery, which started in the first quarter of 2010, has been described as "weak and fragile"[67]. By the 2nd quarter of 2011, real gdp per persn was 5 percent below its level in the 4th quarter of 2007[45] Spain's unemployment rate was among the highest in Europe, reaching over 20 per cent in 2011. A major contributory factor was the bursting of a vigorous housing bubble, as a result of which the construction sector crashed, and the banking sector suffered a downturn despite the fact that it had avoided the acquisition of toxic debt. Another major factor was deleveraging of a deeply indebted household sector. The Government responded with a major fiscal stimulus that, together with the effects of the country's automatic stabilisers resulted in the largest budget deficit in the European Union - although its public debt as a percentage of GDP was among the smallest. In 2010, the bond market developed a debt aversion against Spain following the Greek crisis, the Standard and Poor credit rating agency downgraded its credit rating from AA+ to AA on 28 April 2010[68]. A spread of Spanish government bonds over German government bonds developed in the course of 2010 and had risen to over 3½ per cent by mid-2011.

Portugal

2010 2011
2008 2009 2010 2011   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[21] 0.0 -2.5 1.4 -1.8 1.1 0.2 0.3 -0.6 -0.6 0.0 -1.4 -1.5
Unemployment (% of labour force[21] 8.5 10.6 12.0 12.6 10.5 11.1 11.1 12.3 12.4 12.3
Consumer prices (% increase on the same period of the previous year)[6][24] 2.7 -0.0 1.4 0.3 1.0 1.9 2.2 3.5 3.7

The Portugese economy has long depended upon agricultural exports, tourism, and income from its nationals working abroad - all three of which were hit by the recession. It went into downturn earlier than the European average and emerged no sooner. The Government responded with a fiscal stimulus equivalent to about 1¼ per cent of GDP. According to its statistics institute, the Portugese economy grew by 0.3 per cent in the second quarter of 2009 after contracting in the previous three quarters, leaving it at 3.7 per cent lower than a year previously. The ensuing growth rate has been low and by the 2nd quarter of 2011, real gdp per person was 3 percent below its level in the 4th quarter of 2007[45]and the unemployment rate has remained above 10 per cent. The IMF expects GDP growth to resume in 2012, following a 2.2 per cent contraction 2011[69].

Portugal's public debt reached 77 per cent of GDP in 2009 and was expected to expand further in 2010. [70]. Deficit-reducing measures were put in hand and were met with strong trade union resistance. Unease following downgrades of Greek government bonds caused increasing debt aversion towards Portugal, and Standard and Poor downgraded its credit rating from A+ to A- (4 grades below the top) on 27th April 2010[71]. On 12th January 2011 a €599m issue of bonds maturing in 2020 at a yield of 6.716 per cent was oversubscribed[72], but 6th April the Prime Minister announced that he had applied fr financial assistance from the European Union [73].

The spread of Portugese government bonds over German governmeny bonds had reached 8 percent by August 2011.

RETURN TO TOP

Asia

Japan

2009 2010
2008 2009 2010 2011   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[17][24] -1.2 -5.2 3.5 1.3 -4.2 1.7 0.1 1.0 1.6 0.4 0.9
Unemployment (% of labour force)[18][24] 4.0 5.1 5.1 4.9 4.3 5.1 5.4 5.7 4.9 5.2 5.1 5.7
Consumer prices (% increase on the same period of the previous year)[6][24] 1.4 -1.4 -0.9 -0,7 -0.1 -1.1 -2.2 -2.0 -1.2 -0.9 -0.8 0.1

Japan has suffered a much deeper recession than the other large industrialised economies mainly because of its greater reliance upon exports of cars and high-technology products. Output was also restricted by a credit crunch and by the need to reduce high inventory levels [74]. By the second quarter of 2011 real gdp per person was 5 percent below its level in the 4th quarter of 2007 and 8 per cent below its 1997-2007 trend line[9]. The government introduced fiscal stimulus measures amounting to 2 per cent of GDP . Combined with the effect of the country's automatic stabilisers, its national debt (the majority of which was held by domestic investors) is expected to rise to over 200 per cent of GDP from its already massive pre-crisis level of 167 per cent[3].

Japan entered the recession in 2007 with a national debt of 188 per cent of its GDP which is projected to rise to 246 percent by 2014[3]. About 95 per cent of the national debt is held by domestic investors. In 2008, the country's total debt was 459 per cent of GDP (made up of government debt 188 per cent, household debt 96 per cent and business debt 175 per cent)[12]

On 27 January 2011, Standard and Poor's downgraded Japan's long-term sovereign credit ratings to 'AA-' from 'AA'.long-term sovereign credit ratings to 'AA-' from 'AA[75]

On March 11 2011 a major earthquake and tsunami struck Japan. About 450 thousand people were made homeless, and more than 20,000 may have died. As a result, Japan's GDP is estimated to have been reduced by between 3 and 5 percent.

RETURN TO TOP

China

GDP growth (%),[1]
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
14.2 9.6 9.1 10.3 9.3

In November 2008, the Chinese Government announced a major fiscal stimulus (amounting to 4.4 per cent of GDP) and the adoption of a highly expansionary monetary policy, which partially offset the effect of the collapse in world trade upon China's export sales, and limited the resulting fall in output growth. Export growth resumed in the course of 2009 - rising to above pre-crisis levels in 2010. Output growth began to pick up in the second quarter of 2009 and continued into 2010, supported by an expansionary fiscal stance[76], and there were signs of a developing property boom[77].

India

GDP growth (%) [1]
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
9.0 6.7 9.1 8.8 8.0

A reversal of India's capital inflows started in January 2008 through a massive disinvestment by foreign institutional investors (a net disinvestment of $13.3 billion from January 2008 to February 2009 following a net investment of $17.7 billion during 2007). That was followed by a massive slowdown in external commercial borrowing by India’s companies, trade credit and banking inflows from April 2008 [78]. There was a progressive reduction in manufacturing output in the course of 2009 following a fall in overseas demand for India's exports[79]. Output growth resumed in March 2009, was back on trend by June and is expected to continue at its long-term trend rate through 2010 and beyond[80]. By the second quarter of 2011 real gdp per person was 22 percent above its level in the 4th quarter of 2007[9].

RETURN TO TOP .

Australia

2009 2010
2007 2008 2009   Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4    Q1    Q2    Q3    Q4 
GDP (% change on previous period)[17] 4.2 2.3 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.3 1.0 0.5
Unemployment (% of labour force)[18] 4.4 4.2 5.6 5.3 5.7 5.8 5.6

The government introduced fiscal stimulus measures amounting to 4.6 per cent of GDP spread over the three years 2008-10. In the course of 2009 there was a revival in exports to emerging markets, growth in consumer demand and a recovery in housing and mortgage markets, and in October the central bank raised its discount rate to 3.25%

Africa

South Africa

GDP growth (%)[14]
2007 2008 2009e 2010e
5.1 3.1 -2.1 1.9

The South African economy was growing strongly in 2006 but, in response to the inflationary threat from growing food prices, the Government then adopted a programme of monetary restraint. Economic growth was already slowing when the economy was hit by the financial crisis of late 2008. There was a sudden outflow of international funds, exports fell in response to the falls in international trade and in commodity prices, and the economy went into recession. Output fell by 1.8 percent in the fourth quarter of 2008 and by a further 6.4 percent in the first quarter of 2009. Manufacturing and mining output contracted dramatically, and the unemployment rate rose to 23 per cent. [81]

Other developing countries

The other sub-Sahara African countries were largely unaffected by the recession with the economies of all except Eritrea estimated to have grown by more than 4 per cent between 2009 and 2010[82]. Most of the developing countries experienced a slowdown in economic growth, however. The worst affected were in Latin America and the Caribbean, and in Europe and Central Asia; and none of the other developing countries suffered an actual fall in output. There was weak recovery of output in the course of 2009, but there were still output gaps of around 3 per cent of GDP at the end of 2009, suggesting that high levels of unemployment might continue. perhaps for years [20]. Experience varied among the developing countries, however. Economists at the International Monetary Fund found that the worst affected of the developing countries had been those with highly leveraged domestic financial systems and rapid credit growth. Countries exporting more advanced manufacturing goods had suffered more than those exporting food, and countries with pegged exchange rates had fared less well than those with flexible exchange rates[83].

RETURN TO TOP

References

  1. ↑ 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 Global Economic Prospects, June 2011, World Bank
  2. ↑ Rounded numbers from the chart on The Economist of 28th January 2010[1]
  3. ↑ 3.00 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 3.05 3.06 3.07 3.08 3.09 3.10 The State of Public Finances, Cross-Country Fiscal Monitor: IMF Staff Position Note, November 2009 Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; name "debt" defined multiple times with different content
  4. ↑ GDP 3rd quarter of 2011, Bureau of Economic Analysis, December 2011
  5. ↑ seasonally adjusted Bureau of Labor Statistics data[2]
  6. ↑ 6.0 6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 6.6 6.7 mid-quarter figures (OECD)
  7. ↑ Based on Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner's statement to the Senate Finance Committee March 4 2009
  8. ↑ Federal Reserve "Beige Book", March 2009
  9. ↑ 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.5 9.6 9.7 Checking the depth gauge, The Economist, 20th August 2011
  10. ↑ 10.0 10.1 10.2 [3] Minegishi and Cournède:, Monetary Policy Responses to the Crisis and Exit Strategies, Economics Department Working Paper No. 753, OECD, Febtuary 2010]
  11. ↑ 11.0 11.1 11.2 The Size of the Fiscal Expansion: An Analysis for the Largest Countries, International Monetary Fund, February 2009
  12. ↑ 12.0 12.1 12.2 12.3 12.4 12.5 Charles Roxburgh et al: Debt and deleveraging: The global credit bubble and its economic consequences, The McKinsey Global Institute, January 2010
  13. ↑ Jon Hilsenrath: Fed Split on Move to Bolster Sluggish Economy, Wall Street Journal, August 24, 2010]
  14. ↑ Analysis of the August 1 Budget Control Act, Congressional Budget Office, 1 August 2011
  15. ↑ The Macroeconomic and Budgetary Effects of an Illustrative Policy for Reducing the Federal Budget Deficit, Congressional Budget Office, July 2011
  16. ↑ IMF Statement on U.S. Agreement to Raise Debt Ceiling, IMF Press Release No. 11/301, August 2, 2011
  17. ↑ 17.0 17.1 17.2 17.3 17.4 OECD StatExtracts at[4] & [5]
  18. ↑ 18.0 18.1 18.2 18.3 seasonally adjusted [6]
  19. ↑ Mexican economy hard hit by drop in U.S. remittances, World Focus, February 2010
  20. ↑ 20.0 20.1 Prospects for Developing Economies, Global Economic Prospects Chapter1, World Bank, 21 January 2010
  21. ↑ 21.00 21.01 21.02 21.03 21.04 21.05 21.06 21.07 21.08 21.09 21.10 21.11 21.12 21.13 21.14 21.15 21.16 21.17 21.18 21.19 "Autumn Forecast 2011, European Commission
  22. ↑ Commission assesses stability and convergence programmes of fourteen EU Member States, European Commission, 17 March 2010]
  23. ↑ Provision of deficit and debt data for 2009 - first notification, Eurostat April 2010
  24. ↑ 24.00 24.01 24.02 24.03 24.04 24.05 24.06 24.07 24.08 24.09 24.10 24.11 24.12 European Economic Forecast, Autumn 2010
  25. ↑ 25.0 25.1 OECD
  26. ↑ Philip Davis: Financial Stability in the United Kingdom: Banking on Prudence, OECD Economics, Department Working Papers, No. 717, OECD Publishing, July 2009
  27. ↑ Robert Kuenzel and Birgitte Bjørnbak: The UK Housing Market: Anatomy of a house price boom, EcFin Country Focus, October 2008
  28. ↑ Rush on Northern Rock Continues, BBC News 17 September 2007
  29. ↑ Rescue Plan for UK Banks Unveiled, BBC News 8 October 2008
  30. ↑ Susan Land and Charles Roxburgh:Debt and Deleveraging, World Economics, April-June 2010 [7]
  31. ↑ Fiscal Responsibility Act, Stationery Office, February 2010
  32. ↑ Budget Forecast, June 2010, Office for Budget Responsibility, 2010
  33. ↑ Staff Report for the 2011 Article IV Consultation, IMF 11 July 2011
  34. ↑ Economic Survey of Germany, OECD, March 2010
  35. ↑ Economic Survey of France, OECD, April 2009
  36. ↑ Economic Survey of Italy, OECD, June 2009
  37. ↑ Willem Buiter and Anne SIbert: The Icelandic Banking Crisis and What To Do About It, Policy Insight No 26, Centre for Economic Policy Research, October 2008[8]
  38. ↑ Thorvaldur Gylfason Iceland’s special investigation: The plot thickens, Vox, 30 April 2010
  39. ↑ Economic Survey of Iceland, OECD, September 2009
  40. ↑ Andrea De Michelis: Iceland: Challenging Times For Monetary And Fiscal Policies, Economics Department Working Paper No. 726, OECD October 2009
  41. ↑ Country Report No. 08/362, International Monetary Fund, November 2008
  42. ↑ Statement by the IMF Mission to Iceland, International Monetary Fund, June 28, 2010
  43. ↑ The Tiger Tamed, The Economist, November 2008
  44. ↑ The Party is Definitely Over, The Economist March 19 2009
  45. ↑ 45.0 45.1 45.2 45.3 45.4 GDP recovery since the recession, The Economist online, Aug 18th 2011
  46. ↑ Stacy-Marie Ishmael: S&P strips Ireland of its triple-A rating, FT-Alphaville, March 30 2009
  47. ↑ Budget Statement, Department of Finance, April 7, 2009
  48. ↑ Department of Finance, Ireland. Minister for Finance, Mr Brian Lenihan, TD, announces appointment of interim Managing Director of the National Asset Management Agency (html). Retrieved on 2009-05-12.
  49. ↑ Money Guide Ireland. NAMA - National Asset Management Agency. Retrieved on 2009-05-12.
  50. ↑ Ireland: 2010 Article IV Consultation, International Monetary Fund, July 2010
  51. ↑ Full text of the Government statement on its application for financial aid from the EU and IMF, Irish Times, 22 November 2010
  52. ↑ Announcement of joint EU - IMF Programme for Ireland, Government announcement, 28 November 2010
  53. ↑ Economic Survey of Russia 2009, OECD July 2009
  54. ↑ IMF Executive Board Concludes 2010 Article IV Consultation with Russian Federation, August 2, 2010
  55. ↑ Russian Federation: 2010 Article IV Consultation. International Monetary Fund, July 2010
  56. ↑ Republic of Estonia: Staff Report for the 2009 Article IV Consultation, IMF Country Report No. 10/4, January 2010[9]
  57. ↑ Economic policy challenges in the Baltics, Occasional Papers No. 58, European Commission, February 2010
  58. ↑ Anders Åslund: The Last Shall Be the First: The East European Financial Crisis, Peterson Institute, forthcoming
  59. ↑ Country comparison GDP per capita (PPP), Index Mundi
  60. ↑ "Living conditions in 2008", Eurostat Newsrelease January 2010
  61. ↑ Greece’s Sovereign Credit Rating Cut to A- by S&P, Bloomberg, January 14 2010
  62. ↑ Greek Default Risk Surges to Record Amid "Slow Death" Concern, Bloomberg, 13 January 2010
  63. ↑ "Statement by the Heads of State and Governments of the Euro Area, 2 March 2010
  64. ↑ Statement on the support to Greece by Euro area Members States, Europa, 11 April 2010
  65. ↑ IMF Executive Board Approves €30 Billion Stand-By Arrangement for Greece, IMF Press Release No. 10/187, May 9, 2010
  66. ↑ Statement by EZ Heads of State, 21 July 2011
  67. ↑ Country Report: Spain, International Monetary Fund, July 2010
  68. ↑ S&P downgrades Spain to AA, Financial Times Alphaville 28 April 2010
  69. ↑ Statement by the EC, ECB, and IMF on the First Review Mission to Portugal, IMF Press Release No. 11/307, August 12, 2011
  70. ↑ Country Report on Portugal, International Monetary Fund, January 2010
  71. ↑ S&P cuts Portugal’s ratings two notches to A- , Financial Times Alphaville 27 April 2010
  72. ↑ Dave Shellock Portuguese bond sale boosts confidence, Financial Times, January 12 2011
  73. ↑ Portugal PM Socrates says requests EU aid, Reuters 6 April 2011
  74. ↑ Martin Sommer: Why Has Japan Been Hit So Hard by the Global Recession?, Staff Note SPN/09/05, International Monetary Fund, March 18, 2009
  75. ↑ Ratings On Japan Lowered To 'AA-'; Outlook StableRatings On Japan Lowered To 'AA-'; Outlook Stable, s&P 27/01/2011
  76. ↑ China Quartery Update, World Bank, June 2010
  77. ↑ China Quarterly Update, World Bank, March 2010
  78. ↑ Working Paper No. 241 Mathew Joseph, Karan Singh, Pankaj Vashisht Dony Alex, Alamuru Soumya, Ritika Tewari, and Ritwik Banerjee: The State of the Indian Economy 2009-10, Indian Council for Research on International Relations, October 2009[10]
  79. ↑ Economic Survey 2008-09, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, January 2010
  80. ↑ Country Report: India, March 2010
  81. ↑ Country Report: South Africa, International Monetary Fund, September 2009
  82. ↑ Economist October 30th 2010, page 114
  83. ↑ Pelin Berkmen, Gaston Gelos, Robert Rennhack, and James P. Walsh: The Global Financial Crisis: Explaining Cross-Country Differences in the Output Impact, IMF Working Paper no WP/09/280, December 2009
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=Great_Recession/Addendum&oldid=730888"