Sovereign default: Difference between revisions
imported>Nick Gardner m (→Overview) |
imported>Nick Gardner |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The isolated sovereign defaults that occurred before the 19th century arose mainly from domestic politics or wartime refusal to make payments to enemy creditors. The more numerous defaults of the 19th century were influenced more by international commerce, were concentrated in a few recurring episodes, and tended to infect trading partners. Those of the early twentieth century were mainly associated with the [[First World War]] or with the [[Great Depression|great depression]] and the operation of the [[gold standard]]. Defaults were rare in the post-war years before a concentrated episode that occurred in the early 1980s and another around the turn of the century - both of them associated with the development of [[Banking#Deregulation|deregulation]] and [[International economics#Globalisation|globalisation]]<ref> See Carmen Reinhart: ''Eight Hundred Years of Financial Folly'', summarised at VoxEu April 19 2008[http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/1067]</ref> | The isolated sovereign defaults that occurred before the 19th century arose mainly from domestic politics or wartime refusal to make payments to enemy creditors. The more numerous defaults of the 19th century were influenced more by international commerce, were concentrated in a few recurring episodes, and tended to infect trading partners. Those of the early twentieth century were mainly associated with the [[First World War]] or with the [[Great Depression|great depression]] and the operation of the [[gold standard]]. Defaults were rare in the post-war years before a concentrated episode that occurred in the early 1980s and another around the turn of the century - both of them associated with the development of [[Banking#Deregulation|deregulation]] and [[International economics#Globalisation|globalisation]]<ref> See Carmen Reinhart: ''Eight Hundred Years of Financial Folly'', summarised at VoxEu April 19 2008[http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/1067]</ref> | ||
===19th century=== | ===The 19th century=== | ||
The development of international financial mobility in the 19th century led to three default episodes, clustered around the 1830s, the 1860s and the 1890s, all associated with the collapse of booms in lending to emerging economies from Britain and France | |||
<ref> Carmen Reinhart and Kenneth Rogoff: ''This Time its Different: A Panoramic View of Eight Centuries of Financial Crises'', National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 13882, March 2008</ref>. The defaults of the 1890s were triggered by doubts about Argentina’s economic stability, which led to the collapse of London's Baring Brothers bank, that had underwritten an Argentine bond, followed by the abrupt withdrawal of all lending to Latin America. | |||
===Pre-war 20th century=== | ===Pre-war 20th century=== | ||
===Post-war 20th century=== | ===Post-war 20th century=== | ||
Revision as of 06:11, 17 February 2010
Definition
The term sovereign debt is generally taken to refer to the failure of a government to comply with its interest payment or debt repayment obligations. That is not a working definition, however, because it is necessary for practical purposes to ignore trivial defaults such as briefly delayed payments, and to make a choice among a range of options such as whether to include the agreed rescheduling of debt, or international bail-outs of sovereign debtors. Practice varies among researchers, and although some of them extend the interpretation of the term to include private sector as well as public sector debt, most of them confine the application of the term to debt held by foreign creditors. Losses suffered by creditors because of inflation or exchange rate changes are not normally included.
Overview
Governments have from time to time chosen to stop servicing their debts rather than attempt to raise the necessary money by taxation. In most cases that choice was effectively forced upon the government concerned by a combination of economic and currency crises, and in most cases it was followed by a restructuring agreement between the defaulting government and its creditors, and the resumption of payments. Under the terms of the post-war Bretton Woods agreement, intervention by the International Monetary Fund may be called upon in order to avoid or mitigate the damage done by sovereign default. Since the 1990s, the ability to insure against default by the purchase of credit default swaps has affected the incidence of default and added to the influence of the credit rating agencies.
Post-war sovereign defaults have been confined to emerging market economies, but the increases in national debt brought about by the recession of 2009 have raised the possibility of default by countries with an established market economies, as indicated by a growth in the premiums that have been added to their bond yields.
History
Overview
The isolated sovereign defaults that occurred before the 19th century arose mainly from domestic politics or wartime refusal to make payments to enemy creditors. The more numerous defaults of the 19th century were influenced more by international commerce, were concentrated in a few recurring episodes, and tended to infect trading partners. Those of the early twentieth century were mainly associated with the First World War or with the great depression and the operation of the gold standard. Defaults were rare in the post-war years before a concentrated episode that occurred in the early 1980s and another around the turn of the century - both of them associated with the development of deregulation and globalisation[1]
The 19th century
The development of international financial mobility in the 19th century led to three default episodes, clustered around the 1830s, the 1860s and the 1890s, all associated with the collapse of booms in lending to emerging economies from Britain and France [2]. The defaults of the 1890s were triggered by doubts about Argentina’s economic stability, which led to the collapse of London's Baring Brothers bank, that had underwritten an Argentine bond, followed by the abrupt withdrawal of all lending to Latin America.