User:Nick Gardner /Sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
imported>Nick Gardner
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
There is a strong presumption, however, that economic welfare is reduced if the government undertakes the allocation of resources would otherwise be allocated by the unimpeded operation of market forces. The theorems of [[welfare economics]] demonstrate that market forces operating under conditions of ''perfect competition'' and ''flexible prices'' guarantee the optimum allocation of a country's resources. A centrally-determined allocation of resources cannot offer such a guarantee because those responsible lack access to the information about the preferences of consumers that is provided to a competitive market by their purchasing behaviour.  But if market forces are impeded by monopolistic possessors of ''market power'' or by the presence of ''externalities'', that information is distorted, economic welfare is diminished,  and there is a possibility that public expenditure could be used to correct the deficiency.


Taxes on employment income can affect the demand for labour as a result of the ''tax wedge'' that is driven between  he cost of labour to employers and the net payment received by employees. The magnitude of the effect  upon unemployment depends upon the ''price flexibility'' in the relevant labour market, because it depends upon the extent to which employees seek to pass a tax increase on to their employers <ref>Daveri and  Tabellini:  ''Unemployment and Taxes: Do taxes affect the rate of unemployment?'', Economic Policy Vol. 15 Issue 30, 2000</ref>




Taxes on employment income can affect the supply of labour as a result both of its ''price effect'' - to the extent that it makes  employees try  to compensate for their loss of after-tax earnings - and its ''substitution effect''  - to the extent that it makes employees willing to sacrifice their reduced net earnings  in exchange for the unchanged the benefits of increased leisure. Empirical evidence tends to indicate that the effect is larger for female labour than for male labour and that it is greater for both when tax rates are progressive. The combined influence of employment income taxation and ''means-tested '' state benefits can also affect the supply of labour as a result of the operation of the ''unemployment and poverty traps''.


 
Labour supply and taxes; Costas Meghir (Institute for Fiscal Studies and University College London) and David Phillips (Institute for Fiscal Studies)
The quantification  of the economic effects of public expenditure is subject to errors and  uncertainties arising from the practical difficulty of determining the preferences of those affected and the conceptual obstacle to the aggregation of their gains and losses of economic welfare<ref> See "The Social Welfare Controversy"[http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Welfare_economics/Tutorials#The_social_welfare_controversy]</ref>. In contrast, social welfare is necessarily maximised, according to the theorems of [[welfare economics]], by market forces operating under conditions of ''perfect competition'' and ''flexible prices''.  For those reasons, it is generally presumed that social welfare is reduced if the public sector controls the provision of  goods and services that could otherwise be supplied by the private sector<ref> The article on [[public goods]] deals with circumstances under which the alternative of supply by the private sector is not available, or only partially available</ref>. That presumption is tenable only in the absence only in the absence of significant amounts of ''market power'', and it has been argued that it need not hold when there is appreciable interdependence among members of a community<ref>[http://www.questia.com/read/66063831 William Baumol: ''Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State'',  Chapter 12, page 180 (summary), Harvard University Press, 1965. (accessible online to Questia subscribers)]</ref>.
 
It is nevertheless common practice to evaluate public expenditure proposals, such as road improvements, using the technique of [[cost-benefit analysis]].
==Political aspects==
The conceptual obstacle to interpersonal arises from the fact that it is not possible to know what goes on in someone else's mind. But, although a full understanding is clearly impossible, some insight is often provided by introspection, and there are cases where  an  approximate comparison is all that is needed. There can be little doubt for example that a road improvement that saves a hundred lives yields benefits that outweigh the costs suffered by a few families who have to move to new homes.

Revision as of 07:01, 9 November 2009

Taxes on employment income can affect the demand for labour as a result of the tax wedge that is driven between he cost of labour to employers and the net payment received by employees. The magnitude of the effect upon unemployment depends upon the price flexibility in the relevant labour market, because it depends upon the extent to which employees seek to pass a tax increase on to their employers [1]


Taxes on employment income can affect the supply of labour as a result both of its price effect - to the extent that it makes employees try to compensate for their loss of after-tax earnings - and its substitution effect - to the extent that it makes employees willing to sacrifice their reduced net earnings in exchange for the unchanged the benefits of increased leisure. Empirical evidence tends to indicate that the effect is larger for female labour than for male labour and that it is greater for both when tax rates are progressive. The combined influence of employment income taxation and means-tested state benefits can also affect the supply of labour as a result of the operation of the unemployment and poverty traps.

Labour supply and taxes; Costas Meghir (Institute for Fiscal Studies and University College London) and David Phillips (Institute for Fiscal Studies)

  1. ↑ Daveri and Tabellini: Unemployment and Taxes: Do taxes affect the rate of unemployment?, Economic Policy Vol. 15 Issue 30, 2000
Retrieved from "https://citizendium.org/wiki/index.php?title=User:Nick_Gardner_/Sandbox&oldid=700407"