Talk:Hawaiian alphabet: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Dustin Bowers (→Origins and Classification: new section) |
imported>Dustin Bowers |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
I think the opening line of the article should be changed, mostly because we do know about the historical origins of Hawai'ian as a spoken language. It is a member of the Austronesian family, and we can trace many aspects of its development through the comparative method. <br> | I think the opening line of the article should be changed, mostly because we do know about the historical origins of Hawai'ian as a spoken language. It is a member of the Austronesian family, and we can trace many aspects of its development through the comparative method. <br> | ||
Also, I feel uncomfortable with categorizing the Hawai'ian alphabet as a subset of the English alphabet. | Also, I feel uncomfortable with categorizing the Hawai'ian alphabet as a subset of the English alphabet. | ||
[[User:Dustin Bowers|Dustin Bowers]] 17:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC) | [[User:Dustin Bowers|Dustin Bowers]] 17:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:06, 20 June 2009
Two questions
Why a redirect from "Hawaiian alpabet"?
If this is not simply an incorrect spelling than this should be mentioned somewhere in the article.
I assume that the writing system was not "developed on January 7, 1822" but rather before that date
and published on it?
Peter Schmitt 09:16, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- I don't remember making a redirect from alpabet, but I do remember making one for Alphabet, with an uppercase A... I'll take a look, and see whats up with that...
- I'm not 100% on the developed on date, but I think it refers to the actual date it was developed. I'd rather not expand on that until I can find more sources to clarify.Drew R. Smith 09:22, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry -- it was Hawaiian Alpabet Peter Schmitt 09:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- That is very strange. I could have sworn I'd put it on the Alphabet, not Alpabet... I guess I'll speedydelete it...Drew R. Smith 09:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry -- it was Hawaiian Alpabet Peter Schmitt 09:34, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- I've deleted Alpabet and moved the redirect to Alphabet. (But actually, I don't think we normally redir from uppercase to lowercase for ordinary words... any reason to do so here?) Caesar Schinas 09:39, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- As far as I know, alphabet is not normally capitalised. But, (and I've done this many times myself) people will capitalise it anyway when they are trying to search for articles regarding a specific alphabet.Drew R. Smith 09:45, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- But in the search, capitalisation doesn't matter. That's why we only normally redirect for different spellings, not different capitalisations. Caesar Schinas 10:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- Good to know! Peter Schmitt 10:41, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
- But in the search, capitalisation doesn't matter. That's why we only normally redirect for different spellings, not different capitalisations. Caesar Schinas 10:03, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
Origins and Classification
I think the opening line of the article should be changed, mostly because we do know about the historical origins of Hawai'ian as a spoken language. It is a member of the Austronesian family, and we can trace many aspects of its development through the comparative method.
Also, I feel uncomfortable with categorizing the Hawai'ian alphabet as a subset of the English alphabet.
Dustin Bowers 17:38, 19 June 2009 (UTC)