Hepatocellular cancer: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
(testing)
imported>Anthony.Sebastian
Line 20: Line 20:


==References cited==
==References cited==
{{Reflist3 test|refs=
{{reflist3 test|refs=


<ref name="pmid11350553">{{cite journal| author=Tong MJ, Blatt LM, Kao VW| title=Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic viral hepatitis in the United States of America. | journal=J Gastroenterol Hepatol | year= 2001 | volume= 16 | issue= 5 | pages= 553-9 | pmid=11350553  
<ref name="pmid11350553">{{cite journal| author=Tong MJ, Blatt LM, Kao VW| title=Surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic viral hepatitis in the United States of America. | journal=J Gastroenterol Hepatol | year= 2001 | volume= 16 | issue= 5 | pages= 553-9 | pmid=11350553  

Revision as of 15:32, 19 October 2011

This article is a stub and thus not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
This editable Main Article is under development and subject to a disclaimer.

Diagnosis

The alpha-fetoprotein may be elevated; however, its positive predictive value is low and it may be elevated in patients with cirrhosis.[1]

Treatment

Hepatocellular cancer treatment information from the National Cancer Institute's Physician Data Query


Prognosis

Add image caption here.

Staging information

Hepatocellular cancer staging information from the National Cancer Institute's Physician Data Query


Screening

"Surveillance is deemed cost-effective if the expected HCC risk exceeds 1.5% per year in patients with hepatitis C and 0.2% per year in patients with hepatitis B. Analysis of recent studies show that alpha-fetoprotein determination lacks adequate sensitivity and specificity for effective surveillance (and for diagnosis). Thus, surveillance has to be based on ultrasound examination. The recommended screening interval is 6 months" according to a clinical practice guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. [2] "In a mixed-aetiology cohort, the most effective surveillance strategy is to screen each patient with AFP assay and ultrasound imaging on a 6-monthly basis" according to a systematic review by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme (UK). [3] In a randomized controlled trial, the relative risk ratio of biannual alpha-fetoprotein and ultrasonography, as compared to no screening, for mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma was 0.6 and the relative risk reduction was 36.7%. In populations similar to those in this study which had a rate of risk as measured by the mortality from hepatocellular carcinoma of 0.1315% without treatment, the number needed to treat is 2070. [4]

References

  1. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named pmid11350553
  2. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named pmid21374666
  3. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named pmid17767898
  4. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named pmid15042359

References cited

Cite error: <ref> tag with name "pmid11350553" defined in <references> has group attribute "" which does not appear in prior text.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "pmid15042359" defined in <references> has group attribute "" which does not appear in prior text.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "pmid17767898" defined in <references> has group attribute "" which does not appear in prior text.
Cite error: <ref> tag with name "pmid21374666" defined in <references> has group attribute "" which does not appear in prior text.