Talk:Crash of 2008: Difference between revisions
imported>Martin Baldwin-Edwards No edit summary |
imported>Hayford Peirce (→article title and redirects: new section) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
A good deal of further evidence bearing on the latter paragraphs of this article is likely to become available in the course of the next three months, so I suggest that their present content be regarded as no more than a stopgap. But I do need comments on the remainder, particularly as regards its clarity. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 10:19, 4 October 2008 (CDT) | A good deal of further evidence bearing on the latter paragraphs of this article is likely to become available in the course of the next three months, so I suggest that their present content be regarded as no more than a stopgap. But I do need comments on the remainder, particularly as regards its clarity. [[User:Nick Gardner|Nick Gardner]] 10:19, 4 October 2008 (CDT) | ||
:To my mind, this is looking really good. I find no problems with clarity, but we need some non-economists to express judgement on that.[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 06:13, 5 October 2008 (CDT) | :To my mind, this is looking really good. I find no problems with clarity, but we need some non-economists to express judgement on that.[[User:Martin Baldwin-Edwards|Martin Baldwin-Edwards]] 06:13, 5 October 2008 (CDT) | ||
== article title and redirects == | |||
I don't think the article's title is particularly intuitive, but I won't suggest changing it. I'm too lazy to do it myself, but I think that a *ton* of redirects should be created, for instance "Financial crisis" FC of 2008, 2008 Credit crisis, CC of 2008, etc. etc. [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 11:54, 5 October 2008 (CDT) |
Revision as of 10:54, 5 October 2008
This article, if written really well so that it is comprehensive yet comprehensible to the educated layman, could create a big boost for CZ. Martin Baldwin-Edwards 10:15, 30 September 2008 (CDT)
That is the combination that I am attempting, but I am finding it difficult. It has ocuurred to me that it would be more manageable if it embodied a rather broad account of the subprime crisis, leaving the detail for a separate article. It would be a great help if someone could tackle that article. - Nick Gardner 11:51, 30 September 2008 (CDT)
A good deal of further evidence bearing on the latter paragraphs of this article is likely to become available in the course of the next three months, so I suggest that their present content be regarded as no more than a stopgap. But I do need comments on the remainder, particularly as regards its clarity. Nick Gardner 10:19, 4 October 2008 (CDT)
- To my mind, this is looking really good. I find no problems with clarity, but we need some non-economists to express judgement on that.Martin Baldwin-Edwards 06:13, 5 October 2008 (CDT)
article title and redirects
I don't think the article's title is particularly intuitive, but I won't suggest changing it. I'm too lazy to do it myself, but I think that a *ton* of redirects should be created, for instance "Financial crisis" FC of 2008, 2008 Credit crisis, CC of 2008, etc. etc. Hayford Peirce 11:54, 5 October 2008 (CDT)
- Article with Definition
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Economics Developed Articles
- Economics Advanced Articles
- Economics Nonstub Articles
- Economics Internal Articles
- Politics Developed Articles
- Politics Advanced Articles
- Politics Nonstub Articles
- Politics Internal Articles
- History Developed Articles
- History Advanced Articles
- History Nonstub Articles
- History Internal Articles
- History tag