Talk:Roman alphabet: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>John Stephenson (move) |
imported>Ro Thorpe No edit summary |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Move== | ==Move== | ||
I think this should be moved to [[Roman alphabet]] - strictly speaking, the Latin alphabet is the one used to write Latin (equivalent to 'English alphabet'). Linguists such as Cook and Bassetti (''Second Language Writing Systems'') use 'Roman alphabet', i.e. a single script with many language-dependent orthographies (rules). [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 19:11, 27 August 2008 (CDT) | I think this should be moved to [[Roman alphabet]] - strictly speaking, the Latin alphabet is the one used to write Latin (equivalent to 'English alphabet'). Linguists such as Cook and Bassetti (''Second Language Writing Systems'') use 'Roman alphabet', i.e. a single script with many language-dependent orthographies (rules). [[User:John Stephenson|John Stephenson]] 19:11, 27 August 2008 (CDT) | ||
:Agreed - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 19:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:43, 27 June 2009
Move
I think this should be moved to Roman alphabet - strictly speaking, the Latin alphabet is the one used to write Latin (equivalent to 'English alphabet'). Linguists such as Cook and Bassetti (Second Language Writing Systems) use 'Roman alphabet', i.e. a single script with many language-dependent orthographies (rules). John Stephenson 19:11, 27 August 2008 (CDT)
- Agreed - Ro Thorpe 19:43, 27 June 2009 (UTC)