Adkins v. Children's Hospital: Difference between revisions
imported>Bruce M. Tindall mNo edit summary |
imported>Meg Taylor (move contents to subgroup) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
'''Adkins v. Children's Hospital''' was a 1923 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that struck down a minimum wage law; 61 U.S. 525 (1923, overruled 1937). | '''Adkins v. Children's Hospital''' was a 1923 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that struck down a minimum wage law; 61 U.S. 525 (1923, overruled 1937). | ||
It held unconstitutional an act of Congress that created a minimum wage board to ascertain and fix adequate wages for women employees in the District of Columbia. The question before the Court was whether the act of Congress constituted a deprivation of "life, liberty or property without due process of law" under the Fifth Amendment. The Court held by a vote of five to three that the act was an unjustified interference by Congress with the freedom of employer and employee to contract as they pleased. Justices [[William H. Taft]], Edward Sanford, and [[Oliver Wendell Holmes]], dissenting, took the view that the Fifth Amendment did not stand in the way of reasonable legislation calculated to correct admitted evils. The case was expressly overruled by the [[New Deal]] Court in ''West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish,'' 300 U.S. 379 (1937). | It held unconstitutional an act of Congress that created a minimum wage board to ascertain and fix adequate wages for women employees in the District of Columbia. The question before the Court was whether the act of Congress constituted a deprivation of "life, liberty or property without due process of law" under the Fifth Amendment. The Court held by a vote of five to three that the act was an unjustified interference by Congress with the freedom of employer and employee to contract as they pleased. Justices [[William H. Taft]], Edward Sanford, and [[Oliver Wendell Holmes]], dissenting, took the view that the Fifth Amendment did not stand in the way of reasonable legislation calculated to correct admitted evils. The case was expressly overruled by the [[New Deal]] Court in ''West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish,'' 300 U.S. 379 (1937). | ||
Revision as of 17:53, 14 September 2013
Adkins v. Children's Hospital was a 1923 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court that struck down a minimum wage law; 61 U.S. 525 (1923, overruled 1937).
It held unconstitutional an act of Congress that created a minimum wage board to ascertain and fix adequate wages for women employees in the District of Columbia. The question before the Court was whether the act of Congress constituted a deprivation of "life, liberty or property without due process of law" under the Fifth Amendment. The Court held by a vote of five to three that the act was an unjustified interference by Congress with the freedom of employer and employee to contract as they pleased. Justices William H. Taft, Edward Sanford, and Oliver Wendell Holmes, dissenting, took the view that the Fifth Amendment did not stand in the way of reasonable legislation calculated to correct admitted evils. The case was expressly overruled by the New Deal Court in West Coast Hotel Company v. Parrish, 300 U.S. 379 (1937).