Talk:Kingston Trio: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(okie, this is where we can talk (or even sing) about these three fine fellows, my early-day heros (and late-day, for that matter))
imported>Ro Thorpe
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
There was I going to read this, & lo & behold, it ain't there yet! [[User:Ro Thorpe|Remove at your leisure]] 14:57, 5 March 2008 (CST)
There was I going to read this, & lo & behold, it ain't there yet! [[User:Ro Thorpe|Remove at your leisure]] 14:57, 5 March 2008 (CST)
:Thank goodness I had backed up it![[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 15:27, 5 March 2008 (CST)
:Thank goodness I had backed up it![[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 15:27, 5 March 2008 (CST)
Backed it up? Where? I created the approval page first, then the talk, and when I went to the article, it said the usual 'you have followed a link to a page...'.  Anyway, I'm glad no harm was done, & I look forward to reading it.  I've also commented on the Proposal page (to The or not to The?) - [[User:Ro Thorpe|Ro Thorpe]] 16:15, 5 March 2008 (CST)

Revision as of 17:15, 5 March 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Discography [?]
Video [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition A very popular American vocal group of the late 1950s and early 1960s that led the folk-music (or urban folk, as it is now sometimes called) revival of that era. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup category Music [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

There was I going to read this, & lo & behold, it ain't there yet! Remove at your leisure 14:57, 5 March 2008 (CST)

Thank goodness I had backed up it!Hayford Peirce 15:27, 5 March 2008 (CST)

Backed it up? Where? I created the approval page first, then the talk, and when I went to the article, it said the usual 'you have followed a link to a page...'. Anyway, I'm glad no harm was done, & I look forward to reading it. I've also commented on the Proposal page (to The or not to The?) - Ro Thorpe 16:15, 5 March 2008 (CST)