CZ:Proposals/New: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Robert W King |
imported>Larry Sanger No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Should history articles be named with general terms first? == | == Should history articles be named with general terms first? == | ||
{{proposal | {{proposal | ||
|Brief descriptive title = Should history articles be named with general terms first? | |||
|Proposal number = 0001 | |Proposal number = 0001 | ||
|Summary of proposal = Should general article names be written as [[France, history]] as preferred to [[History of France]] or [[French History]]? The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g [[France, history]]) should be called [[History of France]] or even [[French history]]. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for [[France]] in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g: | |Summary of proposal = Should general article names be written as [[France, history]] as preferred to [[History of France]] or [[French History]]? The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g [[France, history]]) should be called [[History of France]] or even [[French history]]. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for [[France]] in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g: | ||
| Line 18: | Line 19: | ||
{{proposal | {{proposal | ||
|Brief descriptive title = Enable external feedback | |||
|Proposal number = 0002 | |Proposal number = 0002 | ||
|Brief descriptive title = Should history articles be named with general terms first? | |Brief descriptive title = Should history articles be named with general terms first? | ||
| Line 31: | Line 33: | ||
{{proposal | {{proposal | ||
|Brief descriptive title = Article Content Request help | |||
|Proposal number = 0003 | |Proposal number = 0003 | ||
|Summary of proposal= [[CZ:ACR|Article Content Request]] should exist in order for authors to request article assistance on particular topics within a subject. This is '''not''' intended to be a request for editorial review, rather, it is a system devised to empower citizens to help out on subjects that they might know about. It is meant to spur activity and input from those who might have knowledge in a discipline. | |Summary of proposal= [[CZ:ACR|Article Content Request]] should exist in order for authors to request article assistance on particular topics within a subject. This is '''not''' intended to be a request for editorial review, rather, it is a system devised to empower citizens to help out on subjects that they might know about. It is meant to spur activity and input from those who might have knowledge in a discipline. | ||
Revision as of 17:04, 11 February 2008
Should history articles be named with general terms first?
| Summary: Should general article names be written as France, history as preferred to History of France or French History? The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g France, history) should be called History of France or even French history. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for France in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g:
etc.
| ||||||
| Complete proposal | ||||||
Enable external feedback
Summary: Each article should have a link for non-citizens to submit feedback. Feedback can be read and acted upon by any Citizen. To make the feedback system easier to use for both readers and Citizens, feedback can be in the form of a machine-readable proposed edit.
| ||||
| Complete proposal | ||||
Article Content Request help
Summary: Article Content Request should exist in order for authors to request article assistance on particular topics within a subject. This is not intended to be a request for editorial review, rather, it is a system devised to empower citizens to help out on subjects that they might know about. It is meant to spur activity and input from those who might have knowledge in a discipline.
| ||||||
| Complete proposal | ||||||