Archive:Proposals (old): Difference between revisions
imported>Robert W King No edit summary |
imported>Denis Cavanagh No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
This will provide a better scope for members, as not everyone is involved in the forums, as well as are recipients of dispatches from the various mailing lists. | This will provide a better scope for members, as not everyone is involved in the forums, as well as are recipients of dispatches from the various mailing lists. | ||
==History Naming conventions== | |||
This has been discussed before but deserves a fuller debate. The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g [[France, history]]) should be called [[History of France]] or even [[French history]]. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for [[France]] in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g: | |||
*[[France]] | |||
*[[France, history]] | |||
*[[France, politics]] | |||
*[[France, literature]] | |||
etc. I don't really have an opinion on the issue despite the history workgroup handily being my most active one.[[User:Denis Cavanagh|Denis Cavanagh]] 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 11:29, 8 February 2008
This is a proposed page where general proposals can be made by the community-at-large under various topics.
The justification for having this page is that all serious policy proposals would be able to have a central location on-wiki that everyone could see, monitor, and make comments on.
Additionally, this page will be a feeding point for those proposals to make it up the various ladders for adjudication. It is not recommended that actual policy is to be established in ad-hoc style or by de facto on this page--rather, it facilitates the ability to make proposals and represent community evaluations.
This will provide a better scope for members, as not everyone is involved in the forums, as well as are recipients of dispatches from the various mailing lists.
History Naming conventions
This has been discussed before but deserves a fuller debate. The central points of contention is whether general articles (e.g France, history) should be called History of France or even French history. The idea is that the keyword should be first in an article such as this, with people searching for France in a general search will see a list of articles, e.g:
etc. I don't really have an opinion on the issue despite the history workgroup handily being my most active one.Denis Cavanagh 11:29, 8 February 2008 (CST)