Archive:Approval and Feedback: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
(We definitely need a more efficent approval system (and not just the mechanical details))
imported>Larry Sanger
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
* [[User:Jaime Nubiola|Jaime Nubiola]]
* [[User:Jaime Nubiola|Jaime Nubiola]]
* [[User:Roger Lohmann|Roger Lohmann]]
* [[User:Roger Lohmann|Roger Lohmann]]
* [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa ]]
* [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]]
* (add your name if seriously interested, i.e., if you're interested in doing real work for the initiative)
* (add your name if seriously interested, i.e., if you're interested in doing real work for the initiative)


==Problems with current (Feb. 2008) article approval system==
==Mailing list==
The mailing list for the Approval and Feedback group, acting as a subcommittee of the Editorial Council and with authority to approve A&F proposals, is [http://mail.citizendium.org/mailman/listinfo/cz-approfeed cz-approfeed.]  The list archives are open to read, but only specifically listed members of the A&F group can subscribe.
 
==Problems with current (March 2008) article approval system==
*Rate of approval too slow
*Rate of approval too slow
*Too much confusion about what the process is
*Too much confusion about what the process is

Revision as of 17:38, 25 March 2008

Citizendium Initiatives
Eduzendium | Featured Article | Recruitment | Subpages | Core Articles | Uncategorized pages |
Requested Articles | Feedback Requests | Wanted Articles

|width=10% align=center style="background:#F5F5F5"|  |}

This is the future home of an Approval and Feedback Initiative: it's all about recognizing excellence.

Personnel

Persons interested in taking an active role in developing and managing this initiative (please add your name if you're seriously interested):

Mailing list

The mailing list for the Approval and Feedback group, acting as a subcommittee of the Editorial Council and with authority to approve A&F proposals, is cz-approfeed. The list archives are open to read, but only specifically listed members of the A&F group can subscribe.

Problems with current (March 2008) article approval system

  • Rate of approval too slow
  • Too much confusion about what the process is
  • No simple, prominently-placed version of instructions
  • No easy way to get the word out to specific sets of editors that we want reviews
  • No set way for editors to simply *review* an article and thereby enumerate what an article needs in order to be approvable