Talk:Ayn Rand: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Hayford Peirce
(→‎Awfully critical: okie, I'll make it more neutral if no one else comes along to do so)
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
Line 5: Line 5:
This article is remarkably hostile to Ayn Rand.  It should be neutral, of course, and in that spirit should balance the current criticism with actual details about Rand's views and other works.  One claim is, "She is described by her admirers as ‘a philosopher’ but this is not a term accepted by many in the philosophical community."  This seems a little slanted.  It is certainly true that most philosophers who are familiar with her writings don't think much of her as a philosopher, but I don't recall it often being ''denied'' that she is a philosopher.  I doubt most philosophers care about that particular question--I don't.  I'd say she wasn't a professional philosopher, and that she was an amateur philosopher, and that she was much overrated by herself and her followers.  Does this mean she wasn't a philosopher?  It makes about as much sense to deny that as to deny that black velvet Elvis paintings are art.  Jimmy Wales and I used to debate about the merits of her work.  :-)  --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 02:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
This article is remarkably hostile to Ayn Rand.  It should be neutral, of course, and in that spirit should balance the current criticism with actual details about Rand's views and other works.  One claim is, "She is described by her admirers as ‘a philosopher’ but this is not a term accepted by many in the philosophical community."  This seems a little slanted.  It is certainly true that most philosophers who are familiar with her writings don't think much of her as a philosopher, but I don't recall it often being ''denied'' that she is a philosopher.  I doubt most philosophers care about that particular question--I don't.  I'd say she wasn't a professional philosopher, and that she was an amateur philosopher, and that she was much overrated by herself and her followers.  Does this mean she wasn't a philosopher?  It makes about as much sense to deny that as to deny that black velvet Elvis paintings are art.  Jimmy Wales and I used to debate about the merits of her work.  :-)  --[[User:Larry Sanger|Larry Sanger]] 02:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
:Okie, I have absolutely *no* dogs in this hunt, or fight (except I now wonder how I could have read her interminable books 50 years ago and found them entertaining) -- if no one else steps up, I will neutralize these assertions in the next day or so.  I already did a *little* bit in that direction.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
:Okie, I have absolutely *no* dogs in this hunt, or fight (except I now wonder how I could have read her interminable books 50 years ago and found them entertaining) -- if no one else steps up, I will neutralize these assertions in the next day or so.  I already did a *little* bit in that direction.... [[User:Hayford Peirce|Hayford Peirce]] 03:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
::Well, it hasn't been quite 50 years, but I did go through a certain fascination at 18 or so, until I realized I'd never get a date with Dominique or Dagny. On the other hand, I met my first wife at a political event, where I was the only person who had heard of Objectivism, so she did get a date with Howard. Actually, she's a sort of second-generation Topic Informant, as she did date one of Rand's disciples. Calling himself the dictator of a libertarian commune (!), he did have a black jumpsuit with a gold dollar sign on the chest, with a gold cape for formal occasions. Let's put it this way; I've known enough people that were on her fringes (ummmm...maybe that isn't the word) that I injured my rib cage laughing at Jerry Tucille's book, ''It Usually Begins with Ayn Rand''. [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 03:45, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:45, 27 November 2008

This article is developing and not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
Works [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition (1905-82) Russian-born author of The Fountainhead (1943) and Atlas Shrugged (1957); , considered the founder of a philosophical movement called Objectivism [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Philosophy, Politics and Literature [Categories OK]
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Awfully critical

This article is remarkably hostile to Ayn Rand. It should be neutral, of course, and in that spirit should balance the current criticism with actual details about Rand's views and other works. One claim is, "She is described by her admirers as ‘a philosopher’ but this is not a term accepted by many in the philosophical community." This seems a little slanted. It is certainly true that most philosophers who are familiar with her writings don't think much of her as a philosopher, but I don't recall it often being denied that she is a philosopher. I doubt most philosophers care about that particular question--I don't. I'd say she wasn't a professional philosopher, and that she was an amateur philosopher, and that she was much overrated by herself and her followers. Does this mean she wasn't a philosopher? It makes about as much sense to deny that as to deny that black velvet Elvis paintings are art. Jimmy Wales and I used to debate about the merits of her work.  :-) --Larry Sanger 02:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

Okie, I have absolutely *no* dogs in this hunt, or fight (except I now wonder how I could have read her interminable books 50 years ago and found them entertaining) -- if no one else steps up, I will neutralize these assertions in the next day or so. I already did a *little* bit in that direction.... Hayford Peirce 03:13, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
Well, it hasn't been quite 50 years, but I did go through a certain fascination at 18 or so, until I realized I'd never get a date with Dominique or Dagny. On the other hand, I met my first wife at a political event, where I was the only person who had heard of Objectivism, so she did get a date with Howard. Actually, she's a sort of second-generation Topic Informant, as she did date one of Rand's disciples. Calling himself the dictator of a libertarian commune (!), he did have a black jumpsuit with a gold dollar sign on the chest, with a gold cape for formal occasions. Let's put it this way; I've known enough people that were on her fringes (ummmm...maybe that isn't the word) that I injured my rib cage laughing at Jerry Tucille's book, It Usually Begins with Ayn Rand. Howard C. Berkowitz 03:45, 28 November 2008 (UTC)