Talk:Gettysburg Campaign: Difference between revisions

From Citizendium
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Howard C. Berkowitz
imported>J. Noel Chiappa
(→‎Puzzled as to why this is being renamed a campaign: Well, the battle was part of a larger vision of Lee's)
Line 8: Line 8:


I believe this article would be more properly entitled "Battle of Gettysburg". [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 11:09, 15 June 2008 (CDT)
I believe this article would be more properly entitled "Battle of Gettysburg". [[User:Howard C. Berkowitz|Howard C. Berkowitz]] 11:09, 15 June 2008 (CDT)
: Well, the battle did result from Lee's invasion of the North, which did have a grand strategic goal - to show that the North could not protect its citizens. So I think the whole thing (the march North, the consolidation of the Confederate army units at Gettysburg, etc) could be termed a 'campaign', but you're right, I wouldn't use that term for the three days of fighting there alone. (Although perhaps it's intended to eventually have the article cover the manoeuvering beforehand, too.) [[User:J. Noel Chiappa|J. Noel Chiappa]] 11:14, 15 June 2008 (CDT)

Revision as of 11:14, 15 June 2008

This article is developed but not approved.
Main Article
Discussion
Related Articles  [?]
Bibliography  [?]
External Links  [?]
Citable Version  [?]
 
To learn how to update the categories for this article, see here. To update categories, edit the metadata template.
 Definition The Gettysburg Campaign was a decisive defeat for the Confederacy in the American Civil War in June-July 1863; Gen. Robert E. Lee was the loser, Gen. George Meade of the Union Army the winner. [d] [e]
Checklist and Archives
 Workgroup categories Military and History [Categories OK]
 Subgroup category:  American Civil War
 Talk Archive none  English language variant American English

Puzzled as to why this is being renamed a campaign

While I disagreed with the convention of "Foo, Battle of", I fail to see how the Gettysburg Whatever can be considered a campaign rather than a battle. Neither side planned a major engagement at Gettysburg, which would take it into the level of operational art at which campaigns are fought.

The article speaks of a battle, lasting three days, but does not describe a specific operational-level objective that would make it a campaign, as were Vicksburg and Sherman's operations in Georgia. Technically, the Battle was a meeting engagement, with much tactical improvisation.

I believe this article would be more properly entitled "Battle of Gettysburg". Howard C. Berkowitz 11:09, 15 June 2008 (CDT)

Well, the battle did result from Lee's invasion of the North, which did have a grand strategic goal - to show that the North could not protect its citizens. So I think the whole thing (the march North, the consolidation of the Confederate army units at Gettysburg, etc) could be termed a 'campaign', but you're right, I wouldn't use that term for the three days of fighting there alone. (Although perhaps it's intended to eventually have the article cover the manoeuvering beforehand, too.) J. Noel Chiappa 11:14, 15 June 2008 (CDT)