Talk:NP complexity class: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Peter Schmitt (→Claimed proof: a polymath wiki) |
imported>Sandy Harris |
||
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::: An interesting and useful link [http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP.htm]. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | ::: An interesting and useful link [http://www.win.tue.nl/~gwoegi/P-versus-NP.htm]. --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 23:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::: A polymath wiki on this proof: [http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=Deolalikar%27s_P!%3DNP_paper] --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 20:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC) | ::: A polymath wiki on this proof: [http://michaelnielsen.org/polymath1/index.php?title=Deolalikar%27s_P!%3DNP_paper] --[[User:Peter Schmitt|Peter Schmitt]] 20:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
::: Discussion [http://rjlipton.wordpress.com/2010/08/09/issues-in-the-proof-that-p%E2%89%A0np/] [[User:Sandy Harris|Sandy Harris]] 23:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:10, 11 August 2010
TODO:
- Add formal definitions for P, NP, reduction
- Add citations everywhere
- Make branch and bound section
- add disambiguation page for "NP" that links here
--Warren Schudy 23:55, 12 November 2007 (CST) Why does the subpages template produce that green notice about seeking approval? This article is far from that point!
- Don't worry, just a placeholder :) Aleksander Stos 12:41, 13 November 2007 (CST)
--Warren Schudy 11:50, 18 November 2007 (CST) I added a todo list at the top of the page. Please feel free to edit it.
--Warren Schudy 12:14, 18 November 2007 (CST) Wikipedia uses "NP (complexity)" for the title. Is that a better name?
Claimed proof
There's a claimed proof for P not equal to NP.
PDF at author's page: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/Vinay_Deolalikar/ He says this is a preliminary version, actual paper is a few weeks away.
- Wow!!! Let us stay tuned; what else can I say? Boris Tsirelson 05:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- You were really fast to find this! You cannot expect us to already know if it is true, though. (If I remember correctly, there happened to be similar claims that turned out to be unfounded.) We are curious! --Peter Schmitt 09:42, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- An interesting and useful link [1]. --Peter Schmitt 23:57, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
- A polymath wiki on this proof: [2] --Peter Schmitt 20:47, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Discussion [3] Sandy Harris 23:10, 11 August 2010 (UTC)