Talk:Electron orbital: Difference between revisions
imported>Chris Day No edit summary |
imported>Ethan Karpel No edit summary |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Before starting this, I looked at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital AO in WP]. What an incredibly bad article! A total mess. It started as a reasonably good article in September 2001 (6 years ago). About 500 edits later by 157 (I counted) different people (and a few bots) the article is a complete tragedy. People are still "improving" it, last edit was on October 6, 2007. This is the best example of WP's weakness I have encountered so far. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:19, 8 October 2007 (CDT) | Before starting this, I looked at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital AO in WP]. What an incredibly bad article! A total mess. It started as a reasonably good article in September 2001 (6 years ago). About 500 edits later by 157 (I counted) different people (and a few bots) the article is a complete tragedy. People are still "improving" it, last edit was on October 6, 2007. This is the best example of WP's weakness I have encountered so far. --[[User:Paul Wormer|Paul Wormer]] 09:19, 8 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Too High level? == | |||
I am concerned that this article gets too advanced in its treatment of electron orbitals too quickly for a reader who is new to this topic. I am curious how everyone would feel about adding a new introduction at a more general level before getting into the higher level material. [[User:Ethan Karpel|Ethan Karpel]] 23:18, 31 October 2007 (CDT) |
Revision as of 22:18, 31 October 2007
Atomic orbital in WP
Before starting this, I looked at AO in WP. What an incredibly bad article! A total mess. It started as a reasonably good article in September 2001 (6 years ago). About 500 edits later by 157 (I counted) different people (and a few bots) the article is a complete tragedy. People are still "improving" it, last edit was on October 6, 2007. This is the best example of WP's weakness I have encountered so far. --Paul Wormer 09:19, 8 October 2007 (CDT)
Too High level?
I am concerned that this article gets too advanced in its treatment of electron orbitals too quickly for a reader who is new to this topic. I am curious how everyone would feel about adding a new introduction at a more general level before getting into the higher level material. Ethan Karpel 23:18, 31 October 2007 (CDT)
- Article with Definition
- Chemistry Category Check
- Physics Category Check
- Developed Articles
- Advanced Articles
- Nonstub Articles
- Internal Articles
- Chemistry Developed Articles
- Chemistry Advanced Articles
- Chemistry Nonstub Articles
- Chemistry Internal Articles
- Physics Developed Articles
- Physics Advanced Articles
- Physics Nonstub Articles
- Physics Internal Articles
- Chemistry Underlinked Articles
- Underlinked Articles
- Physics Underlinked Articles